The billionaire chairman of an insurance company describes members of the group as terrorists. To the head of a national wholesalers group, they seem like predators.
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is co-sponsoring a $10 million advertising campaign to “educate voters about the devastating impact” these people are having on the American way of life.
The target of these attacks is not al Qaeda or some new pestilence sweeping the nation. It’s trial lawyers.
These days, the people who bring personal injury lawsuits against corporations, insurers and health-care providers have replaced union bosses as the group corporate America identifies as its public enemy.
And this year, more than ever before, the war of words between corporate leaders and trial lawyers echoes in the battle for the White House.
President Bush has long campaigned against what he calls “frivolous and junk lawsuits,” and he hopes to make tort reform a centerpiece of a second term in office. Business leaders hope he gets a chance.
“We cannot ignore what may prove to be a make-or-break election for legal reform at the national level,” said Thomas J. Donohue, the chamber’s president, shunning the business lobby’s traditional neutrality in presidential races. “When voters go to the polls, they need to know lawsuit abuse destroys jobs, drives doctors out of business and forces companies into bankruptcy.”
The assault on trial lawyers has particular resonance in 2004, as business leaders confront the prospect that a highly successful trial lawyer – – Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina — will be a heartbeat away from the presidency if his Democratic running mate, Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, wins the White House.
“You cannot be pro-doctor, pro-patient, pro-hospital and pro-trial lawyer at the same time,” Bush said at a rally Friday in West Virginia. “You have to choose. My opponent made his choice, and he put him on the ticket.”
While business leaders have put their money behind Bush’s campaign, the trial lawyers have put their dollars behind the Democrats. They say Kerry and Edwards will preserve the right to jury trials as a check on corporate power.
John O’Quinn, a veteran trial lawyer from Houston, also sees this as a make-or-break election.
“Corporate America is in charge these days. They control the White House, the Congress and the Supreme Court. But so far, they don’t control the right to trial by a jury. That’s the only place where ordinary citizens can go and have their complaints heard,” Quinn said. “Ordinary people can’t hire lobbyists in Washington, but in the courtroom, they get an equal chance to stand up against a corporation.”
He and other trial lawyers find it laughable to hear stories that they get rich filing frivolous lawsuits.
Unlike corporate lawyers, who are paid handsomely by the hour to protect their clients, those who sue on behalf of plaintiffs usually get paid only if they win a verdict or a settlement.
Ken Suggs, the president-elect of the Association of Trial Lawyers of America, is a medical-malpractice lawyer in Columbia, S.C. To win a verdict, he needs to convince all 12 jurors that a doctor or a hospital violated the professional standards of care.
“Juries don’t like to hand down verdicts against doctors,” he said. “You can file a few frivolous cases, but if you do, you will be broke in a short time.”
Both sides can point to opinion surveys to bolster their case.
Most Americans — 80 percent in one recent poll — say the nation has too many lawsuits and too much litigation. Yet when Time magazine conducted a poll on the selection of Edwards as the Democrats’ vice presidential nominee, his career as a trial lawyer helped him with voters.
Among those surveyed, 55 percent said his work as a trial lawyer showed he was “willing to fight for the average person against the big companies.”