The sentencing of the man who carried out the Christchurch terrorism attack in 2019 has begun in the Christchurch High Court today. It is the first time in New Zealand that someone will be sentenced under the Terrorism Suppression Act 2002 and where the Court may consider the appropriateness of a sentence of life imprisonment without parole.
“Both of these legal ‘firsts’ highlight the significance of this case for New Zealand’s criminal justice system,” says President of the New Zealand Law Society | Te Kāhui Ture o Aotearoa, Tiana Epati.
Brenton Harrison Tarrant will be sentenced on 51 counts of murder, 40 of attempted murder and the sentencing is expected to last for four days. A significant number of victim impact statements are due to be heard and many relatives have travelled from overseas to be in Court.
“This will be a testing week for all involved and my aroha goes out to the victims and their families”, adds Ms Epati.
To safeguard the integrity of the sentencing process and to assist the court with a defendant who is self-represented, the court has appointed two lawyers:
- a lawyer as independent counsel assisting the court (sometimes referred to as amicus curiae – “friend of the court” in Latin), and
- a lawyer as standby counsel.
In the New Zealand justice system, every defendant has the right to represent themselves by making submissions to the Court or to seek the assistance of appointed standby counsel who can then make submissions and present evidence on their behalf.
The lawyer appointed as standby counsel can assist a self-represented defendant as much or as little as the defendant chooses. If the defendant wishes, they can ask standby counsel to make oral submissions on their behalf. Standby counsel may also file written submissions ahead of the sentencing, addressing the aggravating and mitigating features of the case.
Even if the defendant does not use standby counsel and continues to self-represent, the lawyer appointed as independent counsel to assist the court will help the court on relevant sentencing law and its application to the facts of the case. The lawyer appointed to perform this role is independent from both the defendant and the Crown. His or her role is to assist the court.
“The lawyers who will be acting in these roles throughout the sentencing are doing so because it is their professional duty”, says Ms Epati.
“They will no doubt be feeling the strain of the world’s attention, and the fact that they are there should be commended and not criticised.”
“Despite the extreme nature of this case justice must be served. This can only happen when there is competent and experienced counsel on both sides. The Law Society stands behind all the lawyers involved in this immensely challenging case.”
[adrotate banner=”101″]
- Luxury Expenses Claims Dog Pogust Goodhead
Private jets, yachts and lavish spending are some of the claims against Thomas Goodhead, co-founder of Pogust Goodhead who is now at the center of one of the most significant governance crises in modern UK law firm litigation, according to a Times report. Pogust Goodhead (former SPG Law) secured a £450 million debt facility and is now seeing its co-founder CEO ousted before its headline case reaches judgment. Thomas Goodhead co-founded Pogust Goodhead with U.S. class action veteran Harris Pogust, propelling the firm into the big league in 2023 when it secured a reported £450 million investment . . . log in to read more - One in Three UK Law Firms Breach Anti-Money-Laundering Rules
A third of UK law firms have failed to meet basic anti-money-laundering (AML) standards, according to the Solicitors… Read more: One in Three UK Law Firms Breach Anti-Money-Laundering Rules - What Car Accident Laws Mean for Injury VictimsArticle source: Welcome Law Firm, CT Waterbury, Connecticut, carries a sense of resilience shaped by its working-class roots… Read more: What Car Accident Laws Mean for Injury Victims
- Building a Strong Case: How Employees Can Prove Workplace Harassment Workplace harassment can make your job feel bad sometimes; this can hurt your mind, the way you work… Read more: Building a Strong Case: How Employees Can Prove Workplace Harassment
- How Would Elon Musk Run Your Law Firm?
The man who sent rockets into orbit while simultaneously disrupting the automotive industry has articulated a management philosophy that’s equal parts brilliance and brutality. And while we can’t all aspire to his sleep schedule or his Twitter habits, there’s something law firms, those bastions of precedent and process, might learn from a leader who treats bureaucracy as “a substitute for thinking” and regards failure as the admission price to innovation. So what might the key to building a successful law firm be if Elon Musk was on the management committee? First, let’s consider the five key, “Musk steps{ that are simple but devastingatinlgy effective.
