Paul Hastings Shows Strong London Growth

Paul Hastings’ London office has shown strong growth despite what has been described as ‘muted performance globally.’

Legal Business report that the office has surpassed $100 million with increased turnover of 16 per cent to over $107 million.

ecorded another year of double-digit growth in its City office to surpass $100m, amid a more muted performance globally.

The site reported that the firm’s global revenues hit $1.26bn following a steadier 4 per cent increase compared to the 9 per cent rise in 2018. Profits per equity partner rose 5 per cent to $3.41 million.

‘I think it’s reaping the rewards of the investments we have made in the corporate and finance teams,’ London office chair Arun Birla told Legal Business.

‘We’ve been doing great deals over the year and clients continue to trust us with their matters and premium deals. Our strategy has always been to build on the strengths which resonate with our global practices.’

Recently on LawFuel

• Ex-Legends Global GC Adam Lister Launches Specialist Sports and Infrastructure Law Firm
• The AI Question BigLaw Doesn’t Want Junior Lawyers Asking
• SpaceX’s $75 Billion Liftoff – Meet the Lawyers Steering History’s Biggest IPO
  Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher is steering SpaceX through what has become the largest stock market debut ever, while Davis Polk & Wardwell is guiding the underwriting banks led by Goldman Sachs. Reports from Bloomberg indicate that SpaceX has committed to $25.5 million in legal costs in its amended S-1 — a figure that dwarfs the typical IPO legal spend, though it’s broadly in line with what other mega-deals have paid out. For context, the largest US IPO of 2025, Medline’s $6.3 billion listing advised by Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, generated $25.2 million in legal fees and expenses, while Cerebras Systems’ $5.5 billion IPO, handled by Latham & Watkins, racked up $4.1 million. SpaceX’s number sits almost exactly where Medline landed except SpaceX is aiming for a deal roughly twelve times the size. Log in to read . .
• Legal AI – Kilpatrick Townsend Launches Kilpatrick Labs
• UK Law Firms Are Finally Coming for the Billable Hour – Sort Of
  The billable hour isn’t dead in the UK, but for the first time it’s looking genuinely ill. A growing slice of work is being priced on fixed or value‑based fees, clients are pushing back on “time spent” as a proxy for value, and AI is quietly blowing up the economics of the sacred six‑minute unit. And we’ve talked about the BH’s death many times before. The billable hour’s first real wobble UK legal spend is still mostly billed hourly, but value‑based and fixed‑fee work has crept up to take a sizeable minority share of the market, and it’s moving in one direction. Clients like predictability, finance teams like budgetable numbers, and nobody likes the month‑end surprise when a “quick” matter turns into a timesheet novella. Log in to read . .
• UK Private Wealth Dispute Team Add Leading Lawyer
• Top 7 UK Divorce Lawyers for Complex Property and Real Estate Portfolios
• Australian Immigration Law Firm Collapse Leaves Clients in Limbo as Migration Practice Folds
• Why Most Law Firm Websites Look Identical — And the Five Pages That Actually Win Clients
• Sex, Secrecy, and AI -How the Eleanor Ross Scandal Blew Up ‘Confidential’ Judicial Discipline
• The OpenAI Defense: Inside the Wachtell Trial Team That Just Beat Elon Musk
  While Elon Musk’s legal team tried to transform a federal courtroom in Oakland, California into an existential debate about the fate of human civilization and a “stolen charity,” Sam Altman’s defenders quietly built a procedural guillotine. A unanimous nine-member federal advisory jury took less than two hours to reject all of Musk’s claims against OpenAI, CEO Sam Altman, and President Greg Brockman, which presumably was both surprising and disappointing for the multi-billionaire. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers immediately adopted the verdict from the bench, dismissing the case in full. The same statute-of-limitations finding wiped out Musk’s aiding-and-abetting claim against Microsoft, an early backer of OpenAI’s for-profit arm. Log in to the the lawyer profiles . . .
• From 40 Hours To 4: Is AI Forcing A $200 Billion Rewrite Of The BigLaw Billable Hour?