Clifford Chance Commits to New Gender, Ethnicity & LGBT+ Targets

Gender

Targets heighten focus and accountability to deliver global inclusion strategy

Leading international law firm Clifford Chance has strengthened its commitment to inclusion, diversity and equality of opportunity within the firm with the launch of new and ambitious global and regional targets for gender, LGBT+ and ethnicity inclusion.

As the firm further increases its focus on its global inclusion strategy – change the rules, change the culture and change the lived experience, new regional targets have been introduced to ensure greater ambition, progress and accountability are embedded across the firm’s global network.

Global Managing Partner Matthew Layton comments: ‘Creating an inclusive environment is at the heart of our Clifford Chance values, and is good for our industry, our firm, our colleagues and our clients. While we are making progress, and are proud of doing so, I recognise that today, inclusion and equality of opportunity isn’t the lived experience for many of our people and we have to do much better. To make the change that our people, our clients and society expect from us, we need to be actively campaigning and forging positive, inclusive environments which are enriched by the diversity of our people. We have already seen how we can use data to focus attention on our inclusion challenges and their root causes. Our new targets will be a powerful catalyst for the change we want to see and I hope they will set a new standard for our industry.’

Partner and Global Head of People and Talent Laura King comments: ‘The targets announced today are a step forward, but not a complete solution. Talking about numbers is the easy part; we now need to deliver on the actions which will enable inclusive teams to thrive. No matter what challenges the external environment brings, we must maintain momentum and accelerate our progress, because it is during challenging times, such as the current global environment, that a firm’s values come to the fore. We are committed to breaking down the barriers that are restricting recruitment, progress and retention and believe we will be a stronger firm if we can attract the best people from the widest talent pools by delivering an equality of opportunity and advancement for all.’

The new targets are:

  • At least 40% female and at least 40% male global partners in the firm by 2030
  • APAC, and UK regions will have a goal of increasing the proportion of female partners by 25% by 2025 and by 60% by 2030
  • Americas and Continental Europe regions will have a goal of increasing the proportion of female partners by 35% by 2025 and 100% by 2030
  • ME region has a separate target of attaining 12.5% female partners by 2025 and 25% by 2030
  • Gender targets of at least 40% female and at least 40% male are to be extended at all levels throughout the firm’s structures at a global and regional level, including to counsel, senior associate, associate, business professionals directors and leadership groups by 2025
  • The firm has introduced its first LGBT global partner level target of 3% by 2025
  • Our first minority ethnicity targets have been adopted for the US and UK regions which include 15% of new partners and 30% senior associates and business professionals by 2025

Global Director of Inclusion Tiernan Brady comments: ‘There is nothing inevitable about inclusion. There is no hidden arc of progress that will make it happen automatically.

If we want to build an inclusive firm and society, we have to work hard and campaign for it, set goals and when we achieve them, defend and champion them. Behind the targets announced today is a tailored set of initiatives that represents a comprehensive strategy to deliver greater inclusion.

The top of our firm needs to look like the rest of the firm and the societies we are based in. It is both a core value and an economic imperative, and it is the future for the legal sector.’

More From LawFuel Here

  • The OpenAI Defense: Inside the Wachtell Trial Team That Just Beat Elon Musk
    While Elon Musk’s legal team tried to transform a federal courtroom in Oakland, California into an existential debate about the fate of human civilization and a “stolen charity,” Sam Altman’s defenders quietly built a procedural guillotine. A unanimous nine-member federal advisory jury took less than two hours to reject all of Musk’s claims against OpenAI, CEO Sam Altman, and President Greg Brockman, which presumably was both surprising and disappointing for the multi-billionaire. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers immediately adopted the verdict from the bench, dismissing the case in full. The same statute-of-limitations finding wiped out Musk’s aiding-and-abetting claim against Microsoft, an early backer of OpenAI’s for-profit arm. Log in to the the lawyer profiles . . .
  • From 40 Hours To 4: Is AI Forcing A $200 Billion Rewrite Of The BigLaw Billable Hour?
  • Australian Firm Thomsons Bets on AI With Launch of New AI Legal Brand
  • Quinn Emanuel Hit With $3M Sanctions as Judge Blasts “Deeply Disturbing” Litigation Conduct
  • Trainee To Equity Partner: The 12-Year BigLaw Timeline, Mapped Honestly
    Roughly one in twenty associates who start at a top US firm will make equity partner there. That is the number nobody puts in the recruiting brochure. The brochure says the partnership track is “approximately eight to ten years.” That is technically true and practically misleading — because it describes the timeline of people who finish, not the probability of finishing. The honest answer is that the BigLaw partnership track is a twelve-year funnel with five stages, four exit ramps, and a survival rate that would not pass muster as a clinical trial outcome. Here is what each stage actually looks like. Log in to read timeline . . .
  • Panel Games: Revolut’s New Legal Model is a Quarterly Hunger Games for Big Law
    If you’re a partner at a Magic Circle firm currently leaning back in your Herman Miller chair, comforted by the warmth of a three-year panel appointment, you might want to sit up. The fintech disruptor that refuses to play by the rules is, predictably, about to break yours. Revolut, the neobank recently valued at a staggering $45 billion following a secondary share sale (with some internal projections whispering closer to $75 billion), is officially binning the traditional legal panel model. In its place comes “Revolut Partners,” a system designed to treat law firms less like venerable institutions and more like high-performance software vendors. Log in to read more . .
  • The Partner Who Signed the Brief: Inside Morgan & Morgan’s $5,000 AI Lesson
    If you wanted a single case to put on the cover of every CLE brochure for the next five years, Wadsworth v. Walmart Inc. would do nicely. A hoverboard explodes in a Wyoming family’s home. The family sues. Their lawyers — from America’s loudest plaintiffs’ firm, no less — file a motion in limine citing nine cases. Eight of them do not exist. They have never existed. They were, in the now-familiar verb of our age, hallucinated. And so on 24 February 2025, U.S. District Judge Kelly H. Rankin handed down what is shaping up to be the defining American sanctions order of the generative-AI era. Rudwin Ayala — the Morgan & Morgan associate who actually fed the brief into the firm’s in-house AI tool, charmingly named MX2.law — lost his pro hac vice admission and was fined $3,000. Log in to read . . .
Scroll to Top