Its a case of a nasty divorce that just got nastier disaffected litigant Allison Huynh alleged that Big Law firm Morrison & Foerster had been a “willing architect and facilitator” in a nefarious scheme to cheat her and her children out of former husband and Google code writer Scott Hassan’s share of a fortune.
Hassan (right) helped write Google’s original code and is widely regarded as Google’s ‘third founder’.
A tech and robotics entrepreneur, he is sued in the messy divorce with Huynh claiming Morrison & Foerster represented her husband in a manner thast created financial harm to herself as a former client of the firm.
Huynh is herself a tech entrepreneur and began the divorce proceedings in 2015 following a 15 year marriage to Hassan
The lawsuit describes the firm’s alleged “disloyalty to and betrayal of” Huynh, who’s represented by Walter Lack and Steven Shuman of Los Angeles-based litigation firm Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack.
“We deny all the allegations made by the plaintiff against the firm and its representatives and we will address them in the proper forum,” a Morrison & Foerster spokesperson said.
Morrison & Foerster was “the willing architect and facilitator” of Hassan’s “nefarious scheme to cheat his wife and children out of hundreds of millions of dollars,” the suit alleges.
Before the divorce filing, Morrison & Foerster had represented Huynh in the formation of her own tech company while also representing tech and real-estate family companies launched by Hassan, the suit says. The suit describes Hassan as the widely acknowledged “third founder of Google.”
When Huynh filed for divorce, Morrison & Foerster “improperly chose sides, aligning themselves with Hassan,” her lawsuit said.
The firm “associated in” as Hassan’s counsel, represented at least six Hassan-affiliated deponents, and “continued to represent the family companies that Hassan managed in a way that was detrimental.”
The family court judge in the divorce disqualified Morrison & Foerster from representing Hassan in that action, but the law firm “decided to flout rather than follow” the order by continuing to assist Hassan in the divorce and by representing companies he managed, the suit alleges.
A $90 million tax benefit to Hassan is one of the issues pleaded by Huynh as the result of an alleged ‘fire sale’ of one of his companies for “a paltry $400,000, thus creating the tax benefit. As half owner of the company, Huynh said she had to file a suit to stop the sale, incurring over $1 million in legal costs.
Forbes and Bloomberg Law had coverage of the prior lawsuit.
Along with the firm itself, Morrison & Foerster partner Paul “Chip” Lion III is also named as a defendant.
Morrison & Foerster deny all the allegations made against them.
Read More From One of the Net’s First Law News Sites
- The Phantom Raise: Why The 2026 BigLaw Scale Hasn’t Moved — And Which Firm Breaks First
It is May 2026, and the BigLaw salary scale has not moved for two and a half years. That sentence would have sounded unthinkable in 2021, when Milbank ignited a comp war that pushed first-year associates from $190,000 to $215,000 in eight weeks. Three years on, Class of 2025 first-years are starting on $225,000 — the same number Milbank put on the board in November 2023. Eighth-years are still on $435,000. Cravath confirmed in its November 18, 2025 bonus memo, in writing, that base salaries would not rise in 2026. The lockstep is intact. The escalator has stopped. So when does it start again, we ask – and presumably you want the answer to that so we’ve done our best to pose some on-the-button questions. Log in and check how the salary scale looks now . . . - Best AI Contract Generators for Agencies Managing Multiple Clients
- How Judges Decide Your Bail Amount: 6 Factors That Can Affect Your Hearing
- How Ottawa Criminal Defence Lawyers Protect Your Rights After an Arrest
- You Worked the Hours and They Just Decided Not to Pay for All of Them and That Is Not Legal
- Most Disability Claims Get Denied the First Time and the Difference Is Usually Who Fights It Next
- The Difference Between a Case That Settles Fast and One That Gets You What You’re Actually Owed Often Comes Down to Who’s Standing in Your Corner from Day One
