Is the British jury system under attack? Plans to abolish jury trials in complex fraud cases forsakes an 800-year-old tradition. Where will it stop – or has it already?

Plans to abolish juries in complex fraud trials do not amount to a general attack on jury trial, the Attorney General insisted today.

Lord Goldsmith QC unveiled plans to enact a change in the law which was passed by Parliament more than 18 months ago.

It will allow a single judge to sit on complex fraud trials, forsaking the 800-year-old tradition that defendants are tried by a panel of 12 jurors.

The Government will move to introduce the law change in the autumn by seeking a vote in both the Commons and the Lords.

“This provision is not part of a general assault on jury trial,” said Lord Goldsmith.

“The Government is strongly in favour of trial by jury in the vast majority of cases, where it will remain absolutely appropriate.”

Civil liberties campaigners argued that removing juries from fraud trials was the thin end of the wedge which would lead to more types of crime being tried without jurors.

But Lord Goldsmith said: “If this were the thin end of the wedge it’s the thinnest end of the wedge there can conceivably be.”

The move was likely to involve between 15 and 20 cases a year, he added.

He said there was currently a “double standard” where convictions are gained in simple, petty frauds but more complex cases either have to be abandoned or never get before a court.

“We can’t have a situation of easy-to-prosecute blue-collar crime and unprosecutable white-collar crime,” he said.

Scroll to Top