
The bitter legal battle between Owen Glenn and Eric Watson has resulted in a four month prison term for Watson after he was sentenced to four months’ jail for contempt of court for withholding information from the philanthropist magnate.
The prominent businessman was handed the immediate prison sentence by a High Court judge in London. Watson is to appeal the order according to reports.
[adrotate banner=”107″]
The legal battle between the two former business partners took place over two weeks in 2017 and involved a claim for almost $60 million that Glenn claimed. Glenn’s company, Kea Investments, had brought proceedings for fraud and breach of fiduciary duty against Watson in the High Court of England and Wales five years ago.
In 2018, Lord Justice Christopher Nugee ruled that Kea’s £129m (NZ$252m) investment in a joint European property venture with Watson, called Project Spartan, had been procured by deceit by Watson.
Justice Nugee ruled that Kea Investments was entitled to £43.5m compensation from Watson who was ordered to make an interim payment of more than £25m, plus £3.8m in costs.
The company was also given permission to trace and claim assets belonging to Watson and his associated companies in order to recover money owed.
In June 2019, Kea Investments applied to commit Watson for a number of alleged acts of contempt for failing to comply with those orders.
In a judgment dated October 2, Justice Nugee said Watson claimed to have no assets with which to fund a settlement, and his only prospect of paying Kea was through money earned in the future.
Justice Nugee said Watson chose to hide behind the fact that the account was in his mother’s name, Joan Pollock, and he strongly suspected that his mother may have been led to believe that it would suit Watson if she refused to provide them.
The judge said there were strong grounds to believe Watson had used the period between the end of trial and judgment being handed down to arrange his affairs to make it look like he had no assets and make it difficult for Kea to enforce any judgment.
[adrotate banner=”105″]
[adrotate banner=”106″]
- LawFuel Power List 2025: New Zealand’s Most Influential Lawyers
NZ Law’s Power Lawyer List 2025 By John Bowie, LawFuel Publisher | Another year, another crop of legal luminaries jockeying for recognition. But the LawFuel… Read more: LawFuel Power List 2025: New Zealand’s Most Influential Lawyers - Karen ChangLawFuel Power List No. 7 Chang moves up three spots because the SFO under her leadership stopped resembling a bureaucratic afterthought and started resembling a… Read more: Karen Chang
- Michelle RedingtonLawFuel Power List 2025 No. 9 Redington oversees one of New Zealand’s largest legal teams (70+ lawyers) and the IRD’s digital transformation—one of the Southern… Read more: Michelle Redington
- Troy PilkingtonLawFuel Power List 2025 No. 10 Pilkington rode the Commerce Act reform wave straight into the Power List. As Russell McVeagh’s competition practice leader, he’s… Read more: Troy Pilkington
- Torrin CrowtherLawFuel Power List No. 12 Crowther fronts Bell Gully’s Commerce Act coverage, emphasizing “legal certainty” and “proportionate enforcement”—corporate-speak for “don’t let the regulator overreach.” As… Read more: Torrin Crowther
- Chris Finlayson KCLawFuel Power List 2025 No. 15 The former Attorney-General (2008-2016) remains New Zealand’s pre-eminent Treaty of Waitangi and constitutional lawyer. His 2025 work included leading… Read more: Chris Finlayson KC