in

REDMOND, Wash., Dec. 2 2004 – LAWFUEL – First for lawsuit, law, legal…

REDMOND, Wash., Dec. 2 2004 – LAWFUEL – First for lawsuit, law, legal news — Microsoft Corp. today announced the filing of seven lawsuits against defendants
who allegedly sent spam e-mail that violated the CAN-SPAM (Controlling the
Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing) U.S. anti-spam law. Spam
that contains sexually oriented content that is initially viewable in the
e-mail violates provisions known as “brown paper wrapper” in the CAN-SPAM law
and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) rules. The labeling provisions require
sexually oriented e-mail solicitations to include the label
“SEXUALLY-EXPLICIT:” in both the subject line and the initially viewable area
of an e-mail message.

“Sexually explicit materials and publications for sale in stores are
required by law to be covered from view with a brown paper wrapper, and it’s
important that consumers are protected online in the same way,” said Nancy
Anderson, vice president and deputy general counsel at Microsoft. “Microsoft
is committed to ensuring that Internet users are safe online and protected
from receiving inappropriate content in e-mail that is unsolicited, unwanted
and illegal.”

The seven lawsuits were filed yesterday in Washington State Superior Court
in King County against “John Doe” defendants who have yet to be identified.
The seven lawsuits allege violations of the CAN-SPAM federal law and
Washington state’s Commercial Electronic Mail Act, including using compromised
computers around the world to route spam e-mail messages, using misleading
subject lines, and failing to include an unsubscribe option and physical
address. Collectively, defendants in these cases allegedly sent hundreds of
thousands of e-mail messages to Internet users.

“Labeling requirements for spam are important, and the ‘brown paper
wrapper’ rule is a particularly important provision,” said Anne P. Mitchell,
president of the Institute for Spam and Internet Public Policy (ISIPP). “Not
only does requiring the words ‘sexually explicit’ in the subject line and
message portion of the e-mail aid spam filters, it protects consumers from
unwittingly having to view content that they may deem offensive and troubling.
Internet users should have this kind of control over the materials they
receive in e-mail, and online commercial marketers should be held to this
standard of doing business.”

The CAN-SPAM federal law was passed at the end of 2003 and enacted on
Jan. 1, 2004. The law included provisions directing the FTC to adopt a rule
requiring a mark or notice to be included in all spam containing sexually
oriented material. The purpose of the rule was to ensure that Internet users
are protected from viewing unwanted sexually explicit images and content in
spam. The rule, formally adopted in May 2004, indicates that labeling must be
included both in the subject line of any e-mail message that contains sexually
oriented material, and in what is considered the electronic equivalent of a
“brown paper wrapper” in the body of the message.

Adult-oriented e-mail solicitations make up a significant amount of spam.
In addition to yesterday’s filings, Microsoft filed another John Doe lawsuit
on Nov. 12, 2004, against a spammer soliciting, among other things,
Korean-language adult-oriented Web sites. Microsoft has supported over 115
legal actions worldwide against spammers, including filing 86 lawsuits in the
United States. The company is committed to filing lawsuits against spammers
and other cybercriminals until the problems of spam and other cybercrime have
abated substantially.

Founded in 1975, Microsoft is the worldwide leader in software, services
and solutions that help people and businesses realize their full potential.

NOTE: Microsoft is a registered trademark of Microsoft Corp. in the
United States and/or other countries.

The names of actual products and services mentioned herein may be the
trademarks of their respective owners.

Web Site: http://www.microsoft.com

British MP George Galloway and his opponent the Daily Telegraph will leave no stone unturned to sort out what could be a spectacular libel case.