- New research from Hitachi Capital UK* finds the majority of those working in law want to continue working from home once lockdown is lifted
- Lack of commuting is the number one reason those working in law want to continue home working
- 40% of UK workers reconsidering alternative eco-friendly commutes
61% of legal workers want more home working opportunities once lockdown is over, with the lack of commuting the main reason for wanting to do so, new research reveals.
The study, conducted by Hitachi Capital UK, looks into legal workers’ feelings towards working from home during the pandemic, as well as their attitudes towards their environmental impact and how this has changed due to lockdown.
Considering the findings, the top five professions that would prefer to work from home more often once lockdown is lifted, are:
- Recruitment and HR (69%)
- Sales (67%)
- Science and pharmaceuticals (65%)
- Information technology & Creative arts and design (63%)
- Law (61%)
Law is the fifth most likely profession to want to continue working from home, with 61% of workers in this industry claiming they’d rather work from the comfort of their home than risk a return to the office.
So, what is it that law workers enjoy most about working from home? When asked the question, 33% felt it was the lack of commute in and out of work that made them enjoy home working the most, 28% said it was due to the reduction in meetings and 14% claim it was being able to save money on their commute that make them most enjoy home working.
Whatever limitations lockdown has had on Britain, the pandemic has helped alter people’s mindset towards environmental issues. In fact, two in five (40%) UK workers are considering alternative eco-friendly commutes when they can safely return to work.
The same goes for legal workers too. When asked why they would consider buying an electric car, 42% claimed it was because they are better for the environment, suggesting that lockdown has helped workers examine their carbon footprint and consider more eco-friendly commuting options post-lockdown.
Commenting on the findings, Robert Gordon, CEO of Hitachi Capital, says: “Working from home has both its pros and cons, and our research shows that it could definitely have a lasting impact on the habits of law workers.
“This changing landscape provides employers with an opportunity to re-evaluate their business models. Remote working has forced everyone to rethink their working practises and opens up new opportunities for attracting and retaining the best talent from a wider pool. It could also lead to operational savings, using agile working to offset the cost of expanding office premises.”
* Survey of 1,818 office workers in the UK, conducted in April 2020 by TLF
- Australian Firm Thomsons Bets on AI With Launch of New AI Legal Brand
- Quinn Emanuel Hit With $3M Sanctions as Judge Blasts “Deeply Disturbing” Litigation Conduct
- Trainee To Equity Partner: The 12-Year BigLaw Timeline, Mapped Honestly
Roughly one in twenty associates who start at a top US firm will make equity partner there. That is the number nobody puts in the recruiting brochure. The brochure says the partnership track is “approximately eight to ten years.” That is technically true and practically misleading — because it describes the timeline of people who finish, not the probability of finishing. The honest answer is that the BigLaw partnership track is a twelve-year funnel with five stages, four exit ramps, and a survival rate that would not pass muster as a clinical trial outcome. Here is what each stage actually looks like. Log in to read timeline . . . - Panel Games: Revolut’s New Legal Model is a Quarterly Hunger Games for Big Law
If you’re a partner at a Magic Circle firm currently leaning back in your Herman Miller chair, comforted by the warmth of a three-year panel appointment, you might want to sit up. The fintech disruptor that refuses to play by the rules is, predictably, about to break yours. Revolut, the neobank recently valued at a staggering $45 billion following a secondary share sale (with some internal projections whispering closer to $75 billion), is officially binning the traditional legal panel model. In its place comes “Revolut Partners,” a system designed to treat law firms less like venerable institutions and more like high-performance software vendors. Log in to read more . . - The Partner Who Signed the Brief: Inside Morgan & Morgan’s $5,000 AI Lesson
If you wanted a single case to put on the cover of every CLE brochure for the next five years, Wadsworth v. Walmart Inc. would do nicely. A hoverboard explodes in a Wyoming family’s home. The family sues. Their lawyers — from America’s loudest plaintiffs’ firm, no less — file a motion in limine citing nine cases. Eight of them do not exist. They have never existed. They were, in the now-familiar verb of our age, hallucinated. And so on 24 February 2025, U.S. District Judge Kelly H. Rankin handed down what is shaping up to be the defining American sanctions order of the generative-AI era. Rudwin Ayala — the Morgan & Morgan associate who actually fed the brief into the firm’s in-house AI tool, charmingly named MX2.law — lost his pro hac vice admission and was fined $3,000. Log in to read . . . - Crown Jewel or Holding Pattern? The Meredith Connell Question Won’t Go Away
- Sundaresh Thangavelu named as rising star by New Zealand Law Society’s Property Law Section
