The #MeToo movement has been a pre-Covid issue that continues today with continued focus upon sexual harassment issues, including in the Justice System.
- 1 The #MeToo movement has been a pre-Covid issue that continues today with continued focus upon sexual harassment issues, including in the Justice System.
- 1.1 The Law Firm Debt Collector – What Law Firms Need To Know About Debt Collection
- 1.2 How Smart Was Joe Biden At Law School?
- 1.3 ‘Who Wants To Be A Trump Lawyer?’
- 1.4 Key Tactics To Win At Law Firm Online Marketing . . . So Effective They Should Be Illegal
- 1.5 NZ’s Space Law Growth: Including for Space Lawyers
- 1.6 From New York to New Zealand – Former Lawyer of the Year Receives Honour for Pro Bono and Corporate Work
The recent issues surrounding Prince Andrew and Andrew Cuomo have further highlighted sexual harassment, but there is a firm suggestion in many quarters that the US Justice System (and perhaps others, too) have yet to be impacted by the movement.
The Courts continue to enforce a standard of workplace sexual harassment that makes life difficult for those bringing the claims and seeking justice for them.
As part of an in-depth piece on the #MeToo movement’s impact on the American justice system, The Atlantic focuses on how claims of a hostile work environment remain a “tough sell” in court.
Since the Supreme Court created the “reasonable person” standard in 1993 as a test for whether a “reasonable person” would find particular conduct to be harassment, it has ended up being a major obstacle to relief. Many survivors have had their views deemed “unreasonable” and had sexual assault allegations dismissed because a judge didn’t think a reasonable person would deem what they experienced to be actual sexual harassment.
These incidents have included ones based on repeated, explicit and unwelcome sexual advances. As if that weren’t bad enough, since the 1990’s, many courts have even gone further to state that there must be physical contact to determine whether sexual harassment has occurred. (Anyone who has actually ever been harassed knows that physical interference is categorically not necessary to create full-on abuse.)
So although what behaviors are considered “reasonable” in the workplace have changed drastically from 1993 to now, court outcomes for survivors have decidedly not.
The Atlantic’s article examined almost two dozen cases involving hostile-work-environment claims that reached federal circuit courts since #MeToo’s inception in October 2017, to see if the courts’ definition of sexual harassment and of what is considered “reasonable” had at all changed.
The results of the analysis showed that “despite the ongoing public reckoning…sexual-harassment victims continue to lose in court, and their reasonableness—or rather, lack thereof—is what stands in their way.”