WASHINGTON, June 7, 2004 – LAWFUEL – A lawsuit by former emplo…

WASHINGTON, June 7, 2004 – LAWFUEL – A lawsuit by former employees of Tyson
Foods, Inc. against their employer may go ahead, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of
Appeals ruled on Thursday. The four former workers are seeking damages as a
result of Tyson’s use of illegal aliens to depress wages. They sued the
company under a provision of a 1996 law that made the intentional employment
of illegal aliens for financial gain a violation of the Racketeer Influenced
and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act.

The 6th Circuit reversed a lower court ruling that denied the workers the
opportunity to seek damages from Tyson under the RICO Act. The 1996
Immigration Act allowed private citizens to sue employers for the intentional
employment of illegal aliens to undercut the wages of American workers. The
6th Circuit said that U.S. workers had the right to sue under RICO even if
their place of work was represented by a labor union.

In 2001 the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) subsidized
the first litigation under the RICO statute on behalf of a Connecticut
cleaning company that had been damaged as a result of a competitor’s
employment of low-wage illegal aliens. Howard Foster, a Chicago-based
attorney who represented the workers in the Connecticut case, also represents
the four workers who used to work at Tyson’s Shelbyville, Tennessee poultry
processing plant.

“We are delighted by the 6th Circuit’s ruling, and we congratulate Howard
Foster and his clients for the important stand they are taking on behalf of
all American workers,” said Dan Stein, executive director of FAIR. “The
ability for workers to seek redress when employers systematically and
knowingly hire illegal aliens in order to depress wages is precisely what
Congress had in mind when it expanded the RICO law to include these sorts of

“The motivation of employers to hire illegal alien workers is an economic
one. In the face of the government’s and even their own union’s unwillingness
to enforce our immigration laws, workers need to be able to protect
themselves,” continued Stein. “The right of damaged workers to sue under RICO
and collect treble damages is a case of the punishment fitting the crime.”

FAIR advocated for inclusion of RICO protections in the 1996 law. “There
are still many hurdles for the plaintiffs in this case to overcome,” noted
Stein. “But as long as the government and the unions will not defend American
workers whose livelihoods are undercut by the use of illegal alien labor, we
expect that the workers themselves will increasingly use this provision of the
law to protect their jobs.”

Scroll to Top