In a series of three opinions issued on April 24, 2014, the Federal Circuit has decided that decisions by the Director of the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office to institute — or not to institute — an inter partes review (“IPR”) under 35 U.S.C. § 314 are not immediately reviewable by the Federal Circuit, either through an […]
Institute IPR or Not? A Question Not Immediately Reviewable by Federal Circuit Read More »
As more law firms fail the risk of hiring laterals has placed the hiring law firms in line for potential legal action by the bankruptcy trustee of the failed firm. Arnold & Porter partners wrote the following for Law360, dealing with issues about minimizing risk in lateral hires. By Lisa Hill Fenning, Pamela Phillips, Jonathan
Failing Law Firms and The Risk of Hiring Laterals and Minimizing “Jewel” Risks Read More »
LawFuel.com – On 1 April 2014, the changes to UK competition law brought about by the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 take effect. Companies need to be aware of the heightened regulatory risk as a result of the changes in a number of areas. These include stronger investigative powers, possible earlier intervention in mergers
LawFuel.com – Frankfurt, Germany, 28 March 2014 – During his state visit in Berlin, Chinese president Xi Jinping signed a letter of intent to set up a renminbi clearing house in Frankfurt am Main with the Federal Bank and the People’s Bank of China. Global law firm Baker & McKenzie has dealt with the topic
Baker + McKenzie Sees Benefits in Frankfurt Clearing House for China Trade Read More »
LawFuel.com – Skadden Arps – Market participants that enter into uncleared swaps should expect to receive notifications from swap dealer (SD) and major swap participant (MSP) counterparties regarding segregation of initial margin for swaps. Dodd-Frank amended Commodity Exchange Act Section 4s(l) to provide SD and MSP counterparties with the right to have any initial margin
This article discusses the possible criminalisation of EU competition law, and compares the EU regime to the national competition regimes of individual EU Member States. It is, perhaps, time to take stock of the issue of ’criminal antitrust’ in the EU. In recent years there has been a greater focus on the criminalisation of competition
Morrison & Foerster’s “Unsolicited Views” letter By Ted Powers and Jeffery Bell Certain activist shareholders involved in proxy contests have offered special compensation (e.g., a fee for agreeing to be nominated on the activist’s slate or performance-related bonuses after election) to their director nominees. Activists state a desire to compensate nominees who commit time and
Hostile M&A: Special Compensation Arrangements with Dissident Director Nominees Read More »
LawFuel.com – Law Firm News – The U.K. Court of Appeal’s decision in Durant v Financial Services Authority [2003] (‘‘Durant’’) has commonly been seen to have restricted the definition of ‘‘personal data’’ to the benefit of data controllers, leading to criticism from EU data protection authorities (and some commentators) that, as a result, U.K. law does
Redefining “Personal Data” by the UK Appeal Court Read More »
Greenberg Glusker associate Dan Nabel practises litigation law and has written about the world’s most famous “selfie” and just who owns it. Dan Nabel is an associate in Greenberg Glusker’s Litigation Group. Mr. Nabel handles a variety of litigation matters and provides advice in the areas of intellectual property and real estate. – See more
Who Actually Owns That DeGeneres “Selfie” Anyway? Read More »
Kodak Also to Pay for Liability at Superfund Sites in New York and New Jersey Preet Bharara, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and Judith A. Enck, Regional Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, announced today that the United States has entered into settlement agreements with EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY
