Many criminal cases depend upon the state of mind of the defendant and if there’s a serious mind-problem the law generally doesn’t care. But should judges and juries really be in the business of defining the normal or properly working brain? The NY Times Magazine looks at how advances in neuroscience could transform our legal system.
When historians of the future try to identify the moment that neuroscience began to transform the American legal system, they may point to a little-noticed case from the early 1990s. The case involved Herbert Weinstein, a 65-year-old ad executive who was charged with strangling his wife, Barbara, to death and then, in an effort to […]