
Chinese Company’s SoCal Subsidiary Agrees to Pay More Than $1 Million to Resolve Criminal Investigation into Bribe Payments to Jose Huizar and Illegal Contributions to Other Political Figures
LOS ANGELES – A Chinese company’s Arcadia subsidiary, established to redevelop a downtown Los Angeles hotel, has agreed to pay $1,050,000 to resolve an investigation into the company’s conduct with public officials in the City of Los Angeles, including bribery, honest services fraud, and foreign and conduit campaign contributions.
A three-year non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Jia Yuan USA Co., Inc. is the latest development in the ongoing investigation into a wide-ranging “pay-to-play” scheme in which developers bribed Los Angeles city officials to secure official acts to benefit their real estate projects.
The China-based Shenzhen Hazens established Jia Yuan to acquire, operate and redevelop the Los Angeles Luxe City Center Hotel, which it purchased in 2014 for more than $100 million. Jia Yuan “planned a massive redevelopment that would include retail space, residential units, and hotel rooms, valued at approximately $700 million,” according to a “statement of facts” accompanying the NPA.
The NPA was executed on Monday and announced today by United States Attorney Nick Hanna and FBI Assistant Director in Charge Kristi Koons Johnson.
Under the NPA, Jia Yuan will pay the monetary penalty within two weeks and will continue to cooperate with the FBI’s ongoing public corruption probe. The NPA also requires the cooperation of Jia Yuan’s parent company, as well as other Hazens subsidiaries in the Los Angeles-area.
The NPA details several reasons why the government agreed not to prosecute the company for three years, as long as it refrains from any criminal conduct. Those reasons include the company’s timely acceptance of responsibility for its conduct; remedial measures, including terminating George Chiang as a consultant and improving its compliance program; robust and timely cooperation with the investigation, which included proactively providing the government with records located in China and in the personal possession of its chairman, as well as making the chairman available for an interview while he was located outside the reach of U.S. law enforcement; and agreeing to continue to cooperate with the United States Attorney’s Office and the FBI as the agencies continue to investigate and prosecute cases that may touch upon the company’s conduct.
The statement of facts outlines Jia Yuan’s conduct in relation to former Los Angeles City Councilmember Jose Huizar, who faces a trial in June on a 34-count racketeering indictment, and real estate development consultant George Chiang, who is scheduled to be sentenced in February after pleading guilty earlier this year to participating in a Huizar-led racketeering enterprise.
In the statement of facts, Jia Yuan admits a series of acts, including:
· a Jia Yuan employee provided Katy Perry concert tickets to Huizar soon after Huizar and “Individual 1” – previously identified as the city’s deputy mayor for economic development – intervened in a compliance issue at a Hazens-owned hotel;
· Jia Yuan employees made campaign contributions to several U.S. political candidates, some of which were later reimbursed by the company at the direction of a foreign national, who was prohibited from participating in U.S. elections;
· Jia Yuan provided in-kind contributions to several U.S. political candidates by hosting reduced-cost fundraising events at the Luxe Hotel, some of which took place at the direction of a foreign national who was prohibited from participating in U.S. elections;
· the chairman of the Hazens companies facilitated an introduction that resulted in a contract that paid indirect bribe payments to Huizar, who, in his official capacity, introduced and voted on a motion to benefit the Luxe Hotel project; and
· Chiang organized a Huizar family trip to China that Hazens partially subsidized.
After receiving all of these benefits, Huizar voted to approve the Luxe Hotel project before the city’s Planning and Land Use Management Committee, which he chaired until shortly after federal agents executed search warrants at his Boyle Heights home and city offices in November 2018.
The statement of facts also details how Chiang and Individual 1 asked the Hazens chairman on several occasions to make a $100,000 contribution to a political action committee established to benefit a Huizar relative who was planning to run for his City Council seat. While the chairman did not authorize the donation, Chiang told Huizar that Hazens would make the $100,000 donation, which prompted Huizar to take additional officials acts to approve the Luxe Hotel project.
The NPA does not preclude or limit the investigation or prosecution of individuals, including any current or former Jia Yuan officer, employee or agent.
The matter involving Jia Yuan and the criminal cases stemming from the investigation are being handled by Assistant United States Attorney Mack E. Jenkins, Chief of the Public Corruption and Civil Rights Section, and Assistant United States Attorneys Veronica Dragalin and Melissa J. Mills, also of the Public Corruption and Civil Rights Section.
Any member of the public who has information related to this investigation or any other public corruption matter in the City of Los Angeles is encouraged to send information to the FBI’s email tip line at pctips-losangeles@fbi.gov or to contact the FBI’s Los Angeles Field Office at (310) 477-6565.
Release No. 20-187
- 15 legal tech leaders shaping AI for law in 2026
The 15 legal tech leaders, 10 of whom are highlighted in our LawFuel legaltech leaders list here. - Billing Beyond Reality – When Legal Aid Meets Fantasy Maths
Samina Ahmed, a Manchester-based solicitor, has been struck off after a Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal found she flagrantly falsified her… Read more: Billing Beyond Reality – When Legal Aid Meets Fantasy Maths - Who are the Top Law Tech Innovators in 2026?
Law technology developments are set to continue their rapid growth in 2026, driven in part by a small group of executives, partners and technologists inside both law firms and specialist vendors who are now setting the agenda for this year and beyond. Many of these leaders hold newly created roles such as chief innovation officer or chief AI officer and are charged with turning generative AI, data and automation into measurable results for clients and the business. Authority publications and industry reports on 2025’s top AI and legal tech stories show that generative AI, unified cloud platforms and AI governance will dominate 2026 planning for both firms and in house teams. Log in to see the legal tech leaders . . . - Skadden Arps Meagher & Flom LLP
Power Listing Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPUnited States | GlobalCorporate, Litigation, RegulatoryAuthority Listing — LawFuel Authority Index… Read more: Skadden Arps Meagher & Flom LLP - Understanding the Key Differences Between Tort Law and Personal Injury LawArticle source: Kass & Moses, Injury Attorneys Tort law and personal injury law often get mentioned together, which can… Read more: Understanding the Key Differences Between Tort Law and Personal Injury Law
- How an Experienced Car Accident Attorney Like Lawrence Kajy Helps Victims Understand Their Legal RightsArticle source: Kajy Law Firm, Michigan After a car accident, confusion often sets in just as quickly as the… Read more: How an Experienced Car Accident Attorney Like Lawrence Kajy Helps Victims Understand Their Legal Rights
- What Evidence Does the Jury Consider When Deciding Punitive Damages?Article source: Brian White Personal Injury Lawyers Texas has a unique legal landscape when it comes to civil lawsuits.… Read more: What Evidence Does the Jury Consider When Deciding Punitive Damages?