Britain’s Divorce ‘Go-To’ Lawyer – But Is She Too Expensive?

fiona shackleton lawyer

fiona shackleton lawyerFiona Shackleton is Britain’s most famous divorce lawyer.  She represented Sir Paul McCartney when he divorced Heather Mills, a case that saw Mills’ achieve some further infamy when she poured water over Shackleton’s head.


Now, Fiona Shackleton, who as a Conservative Party peer is properly entitled “Baroness Shackleton of Belgravia”, is being sued by a sociate client who is deeply upset over the size of the law firm’s bills which, says client Mortimer Whealon, are “ridiculous” and account “for every second of their time, even if you haven’t asked for it.”

The Telegraph reports Whealon saying,  “If they are calling you on the phone, or even so much as thinking about your case, the next thing you know you are receiving bills for £600 an hour, which is just crazy.”

She adds: “Divorce is stressful enough, and so to take on your own divorce firm, well, you can only imagine.” Four of the firm’s bills are now being assessed by the court.

The court has already ruled in the firm’s favour on seven other bills.  A spokesman for Payne Hicks Beach said at the time that all the clients had confirmed that they were happy with their bills.A spokesman for the firm says Whealon was never one of the peer’s clients.

Of her claims, that its hourly rate “was agreed in advance”, he says: “She is wrong that the bills were calculated on the basis of £600 per hour.”


Are More Weil Gotshal-Style Layoffs Coming?

law firm layoffsThe Weil Gotshal layoffs have spooked an already fragile legal industry recovery, with some commentators saying there are almost certainly more to come from corporate law firms.

Already there have been office closings, such as Baker & McKenzie’s closure of their San Diego office and the closure also of that city’s office for Goodwin Procter.

But the losing of 60 associates’ jobs at Weiil, together with 110 other employees has created some major concerns among lawyers that there will be many more to follow what Weil has either started, or continued, depending on your viewpoint as to whether any law firm recovery had actually started.


In his interview at Bloomberg Law, Bruce MacEwen speculated that there could be 10 per cent over capacity at Big Law. As AbovetheLaw noted:

In Bruce’s view, Weil is “very much ahead of the curve.” Ominous tidings for associates everywhere. There’s an interesting point in the interview where Pacchia wonders whether the legal profession will ever return to a “halcyon era” where law firm partners’ immediate self-interest is minimized in favor of long-term stewardship.

Bruce, channeling Clubber Lang, responds that the only thing that will return us to that golden era, if it ever existed, is more pain.

Last week we conducted a research poll asking for your take on whether the Weil layoffs signal an oncoming reprise of the Biglaw bloodbath of 2008-09 or a singular phenomenon. Let’s look at the results of our poll and some choice highlights from your responses….

A substantial majority of you are not freaking out. So that’s good. Our poll results broke down as follows:

  • 17% say that there will be widespread layoffs. A repeat of 2008-09.
  • 13% believe that the Weil layoffs are an anomaly and peer firms will not follow suit.
  • 69% predict that there will be additional Biglaw layoffs but nowhere near the scale of 2008-09.

Whatever may occur with legal layoffs, it seems clear that the trend towards further belt tightening by way of office closures or layoffs is set to continue.

About The Author