Former Reserve Bank Governor & Politician Sees Three Waters Law As A Dictatorship

Former Reserve Bank Governor & Politician Sees Three Waters Law As A Dictatorship

Former ACT and National Party leader and Reserve Bank Governor Don Brash has labelled the Labour Party’s passing of the Three Waters law as evidence of a dictatorship that will cost the government votes in the next election.

Writing in the blog ‘Bassett Brash and Hide‘ he took aim at the supposedly voluntary move to control the country’s water supplies.

Don Brash* A Government that ignores reasoned opposition from local government by imposing 50/50 iwi-council co-governance through its Three Waters Plan is yet another step closer to a dictatorship.

Three Waters is the Government’s plan to establish four publicly-owned entities to take responsibility for drinking water, wastewater and stormwater from local councils.

Today, Local Government Minister Nanaia Mahuta confirmed that the Government will force its Three Waters reforms on local councils after it was first pitched as voluntary 

Imposing a plan to give tribal representatives equal say with 67 councils over New Zealand water is outrageous.

Embedding 50/50 co-governance between councils and iwi who claim to represent 17 percent of the population is a major step towards creating a society in which everyone has to check their ancestry to work out their political rights.

Today’s imposition of the Three Waters Plan is a big step towards implementing the He Puapua Plan, which involves two governments under tribal control, one for Maori by Maori and the other a fully bicultural version of what we already have.

The forced introduction of Three Waters initially followed the prescription outlined in the He Puapua plan, which involved consultation with iwi groups first, then propaganda to soften up everyone else.

The frightening aspect of today’s imposition is that when councils expressed concern about asset confiscation and substandard representation, the Ardern Government went ahead and imposed it anyway.

This is an outrageous decision, and will cost the Government votes at the next election.

ReFuel with the top law news weekly that's fun to read
Powered by ConvertKit
Scroll to Top