
Adam Rogas Allegedly Raised $123 Million from Investors Using Financial Statements that Showed Tens of Millions of Dollars of Revenue and Assets that Did Not Exist
Audrey Strauss, the Acting United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and William F. Sweeney Jr., the Assistant Director-in-Charge of the New York Field Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”), announced today that ADAM ROGAS, the co-founder and former CEO, CFO, and member of the board of directors of Las Vegas-based cyberfraud prevention company NS8, Inc. (“NS8”), was charged in a Complaint in Manhattan federal court with securities fraud, fraud in the offer and sale of securities, and wire fraud. ROGAS used fraudulent financial data to obtain over $123 million in financing for NS8, of which he personally obtained approximately $17.5 million. ROGAS was arrested today in the District of Nevada and is expected to be presented before a judge there tomorrow.
Acting Manhattan U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss said: “As alleged, Adam Rogas was the proverbial fox guarding the henhouse. While raising over $100 million from investors for his fraud prevention company, Rogas himself allegedly was engaging in a brazen fraud. Today’s arrest of Rogas ensures that he will be held accountable for his alleged scheme.”
FBI Assistant Director William F. Sweeney Jr. said: “It seems ironic that the co-founder of a company designed to prevent online fraud would engage in fraudulent activity himself, but today that’s exactly what we allege Adam Rogas did. Rogas allegedly raised millions of dollars from investors based on fictitious financial affirmations, and in the end, walked away with nearly $17.5 million worth of that money. Within our complex financial crimes branch, securities fraud cases remain among our top priorities. We’ve seen far too many examples of unscrupulous actors engaging in this type of criminal activity, and we continue to work diligently to weed out this behavior whenever and wherever we find it.”
As alleged in the Complaint unsealed today in Manhattan federal court:[1]
ADAM ROGAS was a co-founder of NS8, and served as its CEO, CFO, and a member of its board of directors. ROGAS was also primarily responsible for the company’s fundraising activities. NS8, based in Las Vegas, Nevada, is a cyberfraud prevention company that developed and sold electronic tools to help online vendors assess the fraud risks of customer transactions. In the fall of 2019 and the spring of 2020, NS8 engaged in fundraising rounds through which it issued Series A Preferred Shares and obtained approximately $123 million in investor funds.
ROGAS maintained control over a bank account into which NS8 received revenue from its customers, and periodically provided monthly statements from that account to NS8’s finance department so that NS8’s financial statements could be created. ROGAS also maintained control over spreadsheets that purportedly tracked customer revenue, which were also used to generate NS8’s financial statements.
ROGAS altered the bank statements before providing them to NS8’s finance department to show tens of millions of dollars in both customer revenue and bank balances that did not exist. In the period from January 2019 through February 2020, between at least approximately 40% and 95% of the purported total assets on NS8’s balance sheet were fictitious. In that same period, the bank statements that ROGAS altered reflected over $40 million in fictitious revenue.
ROGAS used these materially misleading financial statements to raise approximately $123 million from investors in the fall of 2019 and the spring of 2020. During the fundraising process, ROGAS also provided the falsified bank records he had created to auditors who were conducting due diligence on behalf of potential investors. After these fundraising rounds concluded, NS8 conducted a tender offer with the funds raised from investors, and ROGAS received $17.5 million in proceeds from that tender offer, personally and through a company he controlled.
* * *
ROGAS, 43, of Las Vegas, Nevada, is charged with one count of securities fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison, one count of fraud in the offer or sale of securities, which carries a maximum sentence of five years in prison, and one count of wire fraud, which carries a maximum sentence of 20 years in prison. The maximum potential sentences in this case are prescribed by Congress and are provided here for informational purposes only, as any sentencing of the defendant will be determined by the judge.
Ms. Strauss praised the work of the FBI. Ms. Strauss further thanked the Securities and Exchange Commission for its cooperation and assistance in this investigation.
This case is being handled by the Office’s Securities and Commodities Fraud Task Force. Assistant U.S. Attorneys Richard Cooper and Jared Lenow are in charge of the prosecution.
The allegations contained in the Complaint are merely accusations, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty.
20-196
Law Press Releases From Legal Leader LawFuel
- Best Law Firm Marketing Companies in 2026: Proven Agencies and Smart Selection Tips
Best Law Firm Marketing Companies in 2025: How to Choose the Right Partner for Your Practice By LawFuel Editors | Published December 26,… Read more: Best Law Firm Marketing Companies in 2026: Proven Agencies and Smart Selection Tips - How BigLaw Salary Wars And AI Are Upending The Legal World
How BigLaw and AI Is Changing the Law Business Norma Harris, LawFuel contributor In December 2025, Cravath once again kicked off a new… Read more: How BigLaw Salary Wars And AI Are Upending The Legal World - Top European Firms Are Letting Gen AI Draft First – And Partners Aren’t Complaining
European law firms have finally found something that can draft faster than a sleep‑deprived mid‑level – and it doesn’t ask for a bonus or threaten to lateral. New research from The Global Legal Post and LexisNexis shows leading firms in Germany, Spain, Portugal and the Netherlands quietly handing first‑draft duty to generative AI tools, especially for contracts and complex commercial documents. The focus is not sci‑fi robot lawyers, but something far more radical for BigLaw, making use of the knowledge the firm already has. By plugging Gen AI into internal precedents, know‑how banks and document automation systems, these firms are generating “house style” drafts that reflect prior deals, client preferences and jurisdiction‑specific quirks rather than yet another generic template no one quite trusts. Senior partners say the attraction is simple providing better quality at lower cost, delivered with guardrails around confidentiality and auditability that won’t make the GC’s risk committee choke either. Log in to read more . . . - Law Firm SEO In The AI Era – LawFuel Tips on How To Win With Google, AI Overviews And ChatGPT In 2026
Google has just posted its first 100 billion dollar quarter and grew net income by more than 30 percent, driven largely by search and ads. Search volume is still rising, helped by AI Overviews and AI mode, which encourage people to ask more granular questions instead of fewer. For law firms, the key point is simple. Google still owns demand and still owns the ad rails, while AI chat tools like ChatGPT have huge usage but a much weaker monetization and ad ecosystem. Your marketing strategy should assume that Google search and Google Ads remain the primary pipeline for high intent legal leads over the next several years. For LawFuel, after almost a quarter century publishing law firm content, we have a few observations on what is happening law firm marketing right now with the AI tsunami. Log in to read more . . . - Key Takeaways from Forbes’ 2025 Top Lawyers List
Forbes’ 2025 edition of America’s Top Lawyers continues what seems like a yearly battle royale among elite attorneys. The list is intended to… Read more: Key Takeaways from Forbes’ 2025 Top Lawyers List - Who’s at Fault? Breaking Down Car Accident LiabilityArticle Source: Las Vegas Auto Accident law firm Determining liability, or legal responsibility, is the central and often most complex issue following a… Read more: Who’s at Fault? Breaking Down Car Accident Liability
- Fastcase v Alexi – The Legal AI Data Fight Every Firm Should Watch
The Legal AI Data War From Fastcase That Redraws Licence Risk Ben Thomson, LawFuel contributor Clio-owned Fastcase has sued Canadian AI research platform Alexi in… Read more: Fastcase v Alexi – The Legal AI Data Fight Every Firm Should Watch