How Does US Law Exploit Interns?

Kid interns

 Hillary Clinton’s candidacy for the White House has sparked another debate about unpaid interns.
The “overworked and underpaid” (or unpaid) mantra has been something that has developed into lawsuits against major corporations in the past few years.
Tales of exploitation and hardship have been aired and many younger voters are attracted to the opposition to internships as voiced by Hillary Clinton, even though she has unpaid “fellows” working from her own campaign offices.
Forbes writing intern Danali Tietjen writes about the issue, asking how someone like Hillary Clinton (“hypocrisy aside”) could take a stance on the issue.

From Forbes:

Due to widespread misconceptions surrounding internship legislation and the academic credit provision, 35% of the approximate 1 million students that intern each summer are still unpaid, according to Austin-based college research firm InternBridge. Within the private sector, that figure is 38.2%.

Unpaid internships are meant to be the exception, not the norm. Under federal law, employers must compensate their workers an hourly wage of at least $7.25 an hour and at least time and a half for overtime work. That’s non-negotiable. The only exception to this law is if the internship is designed as an “educational training program.”

Non-profits like The Clinton Foundation are in the clear; their interns qualify as volunteers. But for for-profit companies, that exception is supposed to be pretty hard to qualify for.
Among the criteria that must be met for an intern to go unpaid:

The internship experience is for the benefit of the intern
The intern does not displace regular employees
The employer that provides the training derives no immediate advantage from the activities of the intern; and on occasion its operations may actually be impeded
In other words, if the intern boosts productivity, he or she must be paid.

These rules have pushed cash strapped companies to take the so called “academic credit” approach.

The more an internship is structured around an academic experience, the more likely it will be viewed as an educational training program, according to the guidelines.Since the definition of “an academic experience” is vague, the Department of Labor added this clause to clarify: “this often occurs when a college or university exercises oversight over the internship program and provides educational credit.”

Academic credit alone does not make an internship legal, but it does present better to a court than no compensation at all. Plus, requiring credit can result in big savings for companies– paid interns earn an average $12.53/hour. So instead of paying interns, 42.3% of for-profit interns now receive credit, which passes the problem off to colleges.

Media giant Hearst, for instance, which was threatened with an intern lawsuit in 2013, recently posted a position for a Sales and Marketing intern. One of the requirements: “Current undergraduate or graduate student who must be able to earn credit for internship.”

This forces colleges into a lose-lose situation: If they offer credit, they either have to charge students or miss out on big tuition bucks. Plus, they risk associating their name and credits to an internship program they’re not even involved with. But If they don’t, their students aren’t eligible for these internships.

Since there’s no clear solution, many colleges charge tuition for academic credit, placing a serious financial burden on students. At Trinity College, students must enroll in a minimum $600 half-credit course, at UCLA, the “academic credit” costs $1200 and up to $4000 for international students. Bentley College, Bucknell University, and Brandeis University have similar programs.

For rising UCLA senior Angela Campos, that price tag was too high. Campos was offered an internship at prestigious Los Angeles law firm Bergman Dacey Goldsmith this summer, but when she went to accept the internship, she was told she needed to receive academic credit. That was going to cost her between $1200 and $2000, all out of pocket. Since she wouldn’t be a full time student, her academic adviser informed her that her financial aid package wouldn’t cover it; she could take out a loan if she wanted.

“It was very frustrating. I tried to make it work with them, like oh ‘can I work with you some other way?’ I even offered to do it without class credit and they said ‘no, we can’t do that,’” Campos said. “They were very adamant that I specifically get class credit to work with them.”

Campos ended up taking an unpaid internship at the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office. Since the internship is in the public sector, she doesn’t need to receive credit.

Read more at Forbes


How To Get a Law Degree in High Fashion

High fashion

Law specialties are varied and many. Some, like sports and technology law, have moved center stage and become mainstream for both law schools and law firms alike. A newer area however is fashion law, which was started by Fordham University Law School in 2010. Now the university has followed up with another first: a degree program in fashion law offering an LL.M for lawyers and a master degree for nonlawyers.

The first program offers courses and lectures and a two week fashion boot camp, but the new course is altogether more academically-focused.
Fordham University School of Law broke new ground in 2010 when it launched the first academic center

fashion-degreeThe school announced the programs in June with a press conference that featured Diane von Furstenberg, president of the Council of Fashion Designers of America.

The National Law Journal interviewed Fordham’s professor of fashion law, Susan Scafidi, about the degree and what it offers.

From NLJ:

NLJ: Why did it take until 2015 for a law school to offer a specific degree in fashion law?
Scafidi: I think that goes back to why fashion law didn’t exist as a field, and why we had to define it. When I was a junior professor and wanted to write on the topic of fashion law and intellectual property, my tenure committee forbade me to do this. This was not at Fordham—it was elsewhere. They said it was too girly and too frivolous. I made the arguments as to why this was an interesting area, theoretically, and that it’s in a multi-billion-dollar, now trillion-dollar industry. They were unmoved.
I think it comes back to the fact that fashion is an industry that people in authority in the legal profession—mostly men for many years—simply didn’t take seriously. I think that’s why we had sports law decades before we had fashion law. We had arts law and health law and banking law before we had fashion law, despite the fact that it touches all of us, literally.
NLJ: Who do you envision enrolling in the master’s program for nonlawyers?
Scafidi: It would be emerging designers who are excited to have that legal knowledge to add to their skill set. It would be current and aspiring executives in the fashion industry. And people who either are working in the fashion industry or who aspire to do so in specialized areas, such as becoming a licensing director, production manager or even human resources manager. All of those people deal with law on a daily basis but have to figure it out on their own.
NLJ: And who might be interested in the LL.M.?
Scafidi: The LL.M. could be for someone who is a U.S. attorney who is practicing and would like to move into the fashion industry. Or a U.S. attorney who has a number of clients who are in fashion and who would like to understand it more comprehensively. It could be for recent graduates who have taken a law degree and haven’t had the opportunity to dive deeply into fashion law.
And also many international attorneys, because the fashion industry is of course centered here in New York, but also London, Paris, Milan, Tokyo, Dubai, Sydney and many other emerging fashion capitals around the world. Of course, the fashion industry is big in China and India. There is so much to learn in this field, and there are lots of possibilities for different attorneys with different backgrounds and different goals to join us.
NLJ: What topics can students expect to cover in these new programs?
Scafidi: When we think about defining fashion law, I always think of how it touches the life of a garment at every point—from the designer’s dream to the consumer’s closet. That means the intellectual property, the business and finance issues. You have, of course, investment issues, but also real estate and employment. You have international trade and government regulation, so things like customs, tariffs and regulation of safety, sustainability and advertising claims.
Finally, we think about consumer culture and civil rights and dress codes—what people are permitted to wear to schools, to work and on public streets. We have a whole range of different kinds of issues. The idea is that everyone coming through this program will get an overview of fashion law and also be able to dive deeper into the areas they need to know best.
NLJ: Do you think involving well-known designers such as Diane von Furstenberg gives the new program legitimacy?
Scafidi: I think it’s important not only in giving the program legitimacy, but in keeping us connected with the industry, so that we know what to teach and what the industry needs to know. It’s a constant dialogue. We know what is important from a legal perspective, but you can’t really understand the law as it applies to fashion until you understand the business of fashion, which is constantly evolving. It’s much more than legitimacy. It’s really an educational partnership with this industry.
NLJ: Are you surprised by all the attention the program has garnered since you announced it on Monday? The New York Times wrote a story about it.
Scafidi: I am overwhelmed and delighted. Apparently it’s not only interesting to the American audience but to the Italians, the Japanese and Finnish. It’s apparently struck and international chord.

Read more at NLJ

[table id=9 /]

About The Author