Powered by LawFuel – James Hardie’s release to the Australian Stock Exchange yesterday – that it ultimately intends to “cease all manufacturing of products in New Zealand”, at the cost of some 120 Kiwi jobs – is unlikely to stall the class action brought by over 1,000 leaky home owners.
[adrotate banner=”92″]
Adina Thorn, the lawyer leading the action, says the announcement is “concerning” but “not overly surprising” given the history of James Hardie with asbestos in Australia, extensive litigation in that country, and a history of major corporate restructuring.
“We have seen this kind of behaviour before. Now we are seeing a massive downsize of the New Zealand business in the face of significant litigation. Fortunately, our claim is against four other James Hardie companies – three in Australia and the parent company in Ireland. The plaintiffs allege they are each liable.
“If you ask any of the owners – they do not care “which” James Hardie company is legally liable. They just want James Hardie to take responsibility for what they say is designing, manufacturing and selling defective cladding systems and products. They also say that they knew of problems with the products and never said anything, and had a duty to warn”.
“This kind of news gives home owners more stress. Not only do they live in leaky homes in need of recladding and many have mould, they also have health problems, and now have the added worry of “what’s next” with James Hardie. This is when many of the home owners are suffering from significant stress, anxiety and depression”.
The plaintiffs in the class action have a trial in the High Court at Auckland commencing on 3 May 2021 and the trial is due to run for 20 weeks.
For further information please contact:
Adina Thorn Lawyers maryclaire@adinathorn.co.nz +64 9 304 0661
[adrotate banner=”91″]
More on LawFuel
- 15 legal tech leaders shaping AI for law in 2026
The 15 legal tech leaders, 10 of whom are highlighted in our LawFuel legaltech… Read more: 15 legal tech leaders shaping AI for law in 2026 - Billing Beyond Reality – When Legal Aid Meets Fantasy Maths
Samina Ahmed, a Manchester-based solicitor, has been struck off after a Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal… Read more: Billing Beyond Reality – When Legal Aid Meets Fantasy Maths - Who are the Top Law Tech Innovators in 2026?
Law technology developments are set to continue their rapid growth in 2026, driven in part by a small group of executives, partners and technologists inside both law firms and specialist vendors who are now setting the agenda for this year and beyond. Many of these leaders hold newly created roles such as chief innovation officer or chief AI officer and are charged with turning generative AI, data and automation into measurable results for clients and the business. Authority publications and industry reports on 2025’s top AI and legal tech stories show that generative AI, unified cloud platforms and AI governance will dominate 2026 planning for both firms and in house teams. Log in to see the legal tech leaders . . . - Skadden Arps Meagher & Flom LLP
Power Listing Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPUnited States | GlobalCorporate, Litigation, RegulatoryAuthority… Read more: Skadden Arps Meagher & Flom LLP - Understanding the Key Differences Between Tort Law and Personal Injury LawArticle source: Kass & Moses, Injury Attorneys Tort law and personal injury law often… Read more: Understanding the Key Differences Between Tort Law and Personal Injury Law
- How an Experienced Car Accident Attorney Like Lawrence Kajy Helps Victims Understand Their Legal RightsArticle source: Kajy Law Firm, Michigan After a car accident, confusion often sets in… Read more: How an Experienced Car Accident Attorney Like Lawrence Kajy Helps Victims Understand Their Legal Rights
- What Evidence Does the Jury Consider When Deciding Punitive Damages?Article source: Brian White Personal Injury Lawyers Texas has a unique legal landscape when… Read more: What Evidence Does the Jury Consider When Deciding Punitive Damages?
