Powered by LawFuel – James Hardie’s release to the Australian Stock Exchange yesterday – that it ultimately intends to “cease all manufacturing of products in New Zealand”, at the cost of some 120 Kiwi jobs – is unlikely to stall the class action brought by over 1,000 leaky home owners.
[adrotate banner=”92″]
Adina Thorn, the lawyer leading the action, says the announcement is “concerning” but “not overly surprising” given the history of James Hardie with asbestos in Australia, extensive litigation in that country, and a history of major corporate restructuring.
“We have seen this kind of behaviour before. Now we are seeing a massive downsize of the New Zealand business in the face of significant litigation. Fortunately, our claim is against four other James Hardie companies – three in Australia and the parent company in Ireland. The plaintiffs allege they are each liable.
“If you ask any of the owners – they do not care “which” James Hardie company is legally liable. They just want James Hardie to take responsibility for what they say is designing, manufacturing and selling defective cladding systems and products. They also say that they knew of problems with the products and never said anything, and had a duty to warn”.
“This kind of news gives home owners more stress. Not only do they live in leaky homes in need of recladding and many have mould, they also have health problems, and now have the added worry of “what’s next” with James Hardie. This is when many of the home owners are suffering from significant stress, anxiety and depression”.
The plaintiffs in the class action have a trial in the High Court at Auckland commencing on 3 May 2021 and the trial is due to run for 20 weeks.
For further information please contact:
Adina Thorn Lawyers maryclaire@adinathorn.co.nz +64 9 304 0661
[adrotate banner=”91″]
More on LawFuel
- The Phantom Raise: Why The 2026 BigLaw Scale Hasn’t Moved — And Which Firm Breaks First
It is May 2026, and the BigLaw salary scale has not moved for two and a half years. That sentence would have sounded unthinkable in 2021, when Milbank ignited a comp war that pushed first-year associates from $190,000 to $215,000 in eight weeks. Three years on, Class of 2025 first-years are starting on $225,000 — the same number Milbank put on the board in November 2023. Eighth-years are still on $435,000. Cravath confirmed in its November 18, 2025 bonus memo, in writing, that base salaries would not rise in 2026. The lockstep is intact. The escalator has stopped. So when does it start again, we ask – and presumably you want the answer to that so we’ve done our best to pose some on-the-button questions. Log in and check how the salary scale looks now . . . - Best AI Contract Generators for Agencies Managing Multiple Clients
- How Judges Decide Your Bail Amount: 6 Factors That Can Affect Your Hearing
- How Ottawa Criminal Defence Lawyers Protect Your Rights After an Arrest
- You Worked the Hours and They Just Decided Not to Pay for All of Them and That Is Not Legal
- Most Disability Claims Get Denied the First Time and the Difference Is Usually Who Fights It Next
- The Difference Between a Case That Settles Fast and One That Gets You What You’re Actually Owed Often Comes Down to Who’s Standing in Your Corner from Day One
