Lawyers for people who sue the government for civil rights violations …

Lawyers for people who sue the government for civil rights violations and win policy changes through out-of-court settlements have the right to claim attorney fees, according to a Second Circuit Court of Appeals ruling issued yesterday.

On September 30th, 2003, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (the federal appellate court for New York, Connecticut, and Vermont) held that the plaintiffs’ attorneys in Roberson v. Giuliani can recover attorney’s fees for the work they performed litigating the case. This landmark case reestablished the ability of plaintiffs who settle in their civil rights cases to obtain attorneys fees, and was the Second Circuit’s most significant interpretation of the Supreme Court’s Buckhannon decision regarding attorneys’ fees in civil rights cases.

“This decision is a great victory for those whose civil rights have been violated. It will increase their ability to secure attorneys to remedy these violations,” said Randal S. Jeffrey, Assistant Director of General Legal Services Unit at the New York Legal Assistance Group (NYLAG), who argued the case for plaintiffs. “Without this decision, attorneys obtaining favorable settlements in civil rights cases would be unable to collect attorneys fees in any out of court settlements.”

In 1976, Congress enacted Section 1988 of the 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) to ensure that low-income people whose federal civil rights had been violated would have access to legal representation. Section 1988 accomplishes this goal by authorizing courts to award fees to prevailing attorneys in civil rights litigation on behalf of the poor. The Supreme Court’s May 29, 2001 Buckhannon decision more recently interpreted the statute, limiting the ability of civil rights plaintiffs to collect legal fees.

In Mr. Jeffrey’s case, NYLAG brought suit in 1999 on behalf of four plaintiffs whose public assistance, food stamps and Medicaid benefits had been illegally denied and discontinued based on New York City’s Eligibility Verification Review (EVR) offices. In 2001, the case was settled in favor of the plaintiffs, and the Court (the Southern District of New York) retained jurisdiction over the settlement for enforcement purposes. After plaintiffs and the City settled the case, the district court denied plaintiffs’ motion for attorney’s fee based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Buckhannon.

Recognizing the significance of the case, eight New York State legal service providers (Brennan Center for Justice, Sanctuary for Families, the Greater Upstate Law Project, the Northern Manhattan Improvement Corporation, the Partnership for the Homeless, the Public Interest Law Office of Rochester, the Urban Justice Center, and the Welfare Law Center) submitted an amicus brief in favor of plaintiffs’ position.

Scroll to Top