The State of California has reached a tentative $600 million settlement in a lawsuit against the French bank Crédit Lyonnais related to the sale of Executive Life Insurance in 1991.

The State of California has reached a tentative $600 million settlement in a lawsuit against the French bank Crédit Lyonnais related to the sale of Executive Life Insurance in 1991.

A final settlement hinges on whether Sierra National Insurance Holdings, which joined in a lawsuit separate from the state’s case in federal court, will agree to settle claims for a portion of that payment, Norman Williams, a spokesman for California’s Insurance Department, said late Tuesday.

“There is a tentative $600 million settlement on the table right now,” Williams said. “Sierra National Insurance must agree to accept some portion of this settlement.”

An attorney for Sierra National said that the company was still in negotiations over the settlement.

Sierra National was an unsuccessful bidder for Executive Life’s lucrative junk bond portfolio and charged in its lawsuit that fraud by Crédit Lyonnais in the bidding process had deprived it of profit from the bonds.

The state’s lawsuit, filed in 1999, accused Crédit Lyonnais, which was bought by Credit Agricole in 2002 to form France’s largest bank, of concealing the extent of its interest in companies that acquired Executive Life, which state insurance regulators declared insolvent in 1991 and sold at auction.

The French companies acquired the $3.25 billion junk bond portfolio for a fraction of its value and later sold it at a large profit.

The French government controlled Crédit Lyonnais until it was privatized in 1999. In 1995, the government rescued the bank from financial disaster, forming a separate unit, Consortium de Réalisation, to assume the bank’s debts.

California law barred foreign governments from owning state insurers, and the state asserted that Crédit Lyonnais had deprived 300,000 policyholders of profits made from the bonds.

The proposed settlement is far smaller than the damages of more than $3 billion that the California insurance commissioner, John Garamendi, said he would seek when he filed the case in 1999.
in 1999. In


One of First Convictions in Country for Exporting National Security …

One of First Convictions in Country for Exporting National Security Items to Iran

SAN JOSE – LAWFUEL – Law News Network – United States Attorney Kevin V. Ryan announced that Super Micro Computer Inc. pleaded guilty yesterday to a felony charge of unlawfully exporting computer components to Iran in 2001 and 2002. Export of the computer components was banned at the time for reasons of national security under export commodity control number 4A003.b. This guilty plea is the result of an investigation by agents of the Bureau of Industry and Security, Office of Export Enforcement, of the U.S. Department of Commerce, which regulates exports, and Internal Revenue Service – Criminal Investigation.

Super Micro, headquartered in San Jose, Calif., was charged in an information filed by the U.S. Attorney’s Office on September 1, 2006. The company was charged with one count of knowingly exporting items subject to export regulations without obtaining a license, in violation of Title 50, United States Code, section 1705(b). Under the terms of the plea agreement, the company agreed to plead guilty and pay a $150,000 fine. Pursuant to the agreement, Judge Ronald M. Whyte imposed the sentence on the same day the company pleaded guilty. According to the plea agreement, as a result of the investigation the company implemented a new export control program in February 2004. Since the initiation of that program, the government has been monitoring Super Micro’s exports and has found no evidence of further export violations. Remedial actions taken by the company were taken into account for sentencing purposes.

In pleading guilty, the company admitted that between December 28, 2001, and January 29, 2002, the company sold 300 of the company’s P4SBA+ Motherboards to a company named Super Net in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, knowing that the items were to be transhipped to Iran. Super Net paid $27,600 for the items. At the time of the export the items were controlled for reasons of national security, and exporting them to Iran without a license was illegal. The motherboards at issue are no longer controlled for export.

According to Department of Commerce records, this case is one of the first criminal convictions in the nation for exporting items controlled for national security reasons to Iran.

Gary G. Fry is the Assistant U.S. Attorney who prosecuted the case with the assistance of Legal Technician Tracey Andersen.

Further Information:

Case #: CR 06-00597 RMW

A copy of this press release may be found on the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s website at www.usdoj.gov/usao/can.

Electronic court filings and further procedural and docket information are available at https://ecf.cand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/login.pl.

Judges’ calendars with schedules for upcoming court hearings can be viewed on the court’s website at www.cand.uscourts.gov.

All press inquiries to the U.S. Attorney’s Office should be directed to Luke Macaulay at (415) 436-6757 or by email at Luke.Macaulay@usdoj.gov.

About The Author