Personal Injury Law: Who is at Fault in Left Turn Accidents

Grossman Law Offices – In 2017, there were 55 fatal accidents in Fresno. Thousands of others were injured, and some of those collisions were left turn accidents.

Road rules differ in different jurisdictions, being regulated by the states and municipalities through their respective traffic codes. Most of these are based at least in part on the Uniform Vehicle Code, but there are variations from state to state .

Most people assume that a driver making a left turn is always responsible for a left turn accident. But this isn’t always the case. Although the turning driver could be at-fault, the other driver might be to blame. Learn more about liability in left turn collisions and find out what it means for your case.

Why is the Turning Driver Usually Liable?

There’s some truth to the myth that a left turning driver is always responsible for the accident. This is because drivers who are turning need to yield to other vehicles. If a driver turns and hits oncoming traffic, they are failing to yield. They have the responsibility of yielding to other cars, pedestrians, and cyclists.

The major exception to the failure to yield law is for drivers who are turning at a green arrow. If there is a green turn signal, they have the right of way. An oncoming car would have ignored a traffic light, which would make them liable.

When the police arrive on the scene of an accident, they are likely to ticket the driver who was turning. But this does not mean the driver is the only one responsible for the accident. It’s possible that there are other circumstances and the other driver has some culpability.

What are the Exceptions?

There are some exceptions to left turn liability. For instance, a turning driver might not be at-fault if the other driver was significantly speeding. This can be difficult to prove, as witnesses can only guess how fast the driver was going. Furthermore, the speeding driver may not admit to driving too fast.

Another exception is when the other driver did not yield to a red light or stop sign. Their failure to yield puts the blame on their shoulders. Typically, this is easier to prove than speeding. You might have witnesses or traffic camera evidence.

In some cases, the other driver isn’t responsible, but a third-party is. An unexpected incident, like debris in the road, could cause the turning driver to slow down or stop. 

Shared Fault

Even if you are partially liable for the left-turn accident, you could still hold the other driver responsible for your damages. In California, there is a comparative fault law. One driver can hold the other accountable for a collision even if they share some blame.

You can file a personal injury claim against the other driver if you experienced injuries and if they acted negligently. For example, the other driver may have been guilty of drunk driving. Their negligent behavior means you have a chance at filing a claim against them.

There is one important detail regarding comparative fault. You cannot receive the full amount of damages if you share fault. If you are 20% at-fault, you will only be awarded 80% of the damages. It might not be everything, but it’s better than nothing. 

Working with an Attorney 

It is obvious that if you need to know more about accident liability then an attorney is going to be necessary, particularly when the issue of liability is not one that is black and white. Determination of fault can rest on a number of factors.

Car accident lawyers can tell you more about California car accident law. Furthermore, they can guide you as you seek compensation. They can help you negotiate with the insurance company or file a personal injury claim. Either way, you have a chance at getting the money you need to recover.

Grossman Law Offices are personal injury lawyers based in Fresno, California. Denis Grossman has two decades of legal experience and has been admitted to the bar of two states: New York (1997) and California (2004).


Raynor Asher’s Return to the Bar

Raynor asher lawfuel

Tom Brody – The trend for ‘retired’ judges returning to the bar continues with Raynor Asher QC joining Richmond Chambers.

He retired from the Court of Appeal, after serving on the High Court for 10 years until 2016.

>> See the latest law jobs on the LawFuel Network

The trend towards former judges returning to work as mediators and/or arbtirators is something that is increasingly common in Western jurisdictions, with many Judges still seeking active legal service in their 70s.

Raynor Asher follows several colleagues who resume practice after their judicial duties have been completed, the most recent being Rhys Harrison QC, whose website even includes the honorific, “HonourableRhysHarrisonQC”, lest we forget who he is.

Other recent additions to the ranks of the working former jurists are the Hon. ‘Kit’ Toogood, who retired from the Bench in August, 

Generally ‘returning judges’ will act on mediation and arbitration matters, although Raynor Asher’s bio says that he will also provide “be giving litigation and other advice.”

Numerous other jurists at the bar include Rodney Harrison, Sir Ian Barker QC, (now retired)  Sir David Williams QC who has established himself in a world-leading arbitration career after an early termination of his judicial post and Robert Fisher QC who have together helped set the benchmark for post-judicial careers.

LawFuel looked at what each say about their area(s) of practice, often reported in the third person:

Rodney Hansen QC, Shortland Chambers –  Only a brief outline of the role of mediators and arbitrators.

Members act as arbitrators and mediators in a broad range of disputes involving national and international parties.  Arbitrators determine disputes in a quasi-judicial manner.  Mediators assist parties to come to an agreed resolution.

Sir David Williams QC, Bankside Chambers – 

Sir David Williams QC is a barrister and arbitrator with over 30 years’ experience as counsel in commercial litigation before New Zealand and overseas Courts and Arbitral Tribunals including numerous New Zealand cases heard in the Privy Council, London, England. Based on this extensive and broad-based commercial litigation background, and after serving as a Justice on the High Court of New Zealand, he has developed a strong emphasis on international commercial arbitration and investment treaty arbitration, mainly as an arbitrator but occasionally as counsel.

Robert Fisher QC – Bankside Chambers – A third-person outline of his credentials.

Robert Fisher has been in full-time practice as a mediator and arbitrator since 2004. He maintains a dispute resolution office and staff in downtown Auckland, NZ, but travels widely for this purpose . . He is available to act as an arbitrator in cases where the parties are legally represented.

Rhys Harrison QC

He has returned to professional practice and is available for arbitration, mediation and general advisory work . . He also conducted over 30 judicial settlement conferences, an alternative dispute resolution process available within the High Court

 Kit Toogood QC

Working as a mediator, arbitrator, litigation advisor and consultant, former High Court Judge and Bankside Chambers’ barrister the Kit Toogood has most recently been briefed to investigate the death of a Canterbury University student Mason Pendrous.

Jeremy Doogue

Former District Court Judge and Associate High Court Judge Jeremy Doogue is at FortyEight Shortland, in the ‘hgeart’ of the legal district.

Jeremy specialises in all aspects of commercial litigation and, in particular, contract, tort, trust and liquidation-type cases. His primary role is that of an arbitrator although he is also available for mediations. He is a fellow of AMINZ. He is also available for consultation on litigation strategy, early neutral valuations and to provide opinions.

Nicholas Davidson QC

Retiring from the High Court in December 2018, Hon ‘Nick’ Davidson QC works from Chambers in his former home town Christchurch and in Auckland as arbitrator, mediator and ‘stragegic advisor’

John Matthews – Canterbury Chambers

Having spent eight years as an Associate High Court Judge John Matthews now works as a mediator, arbitrator and negotiator. 

Disputes on which I invite you to instruct me include existing litigation in the Senior Courts, Family Court, Environment Court and District Court, but also disputes between persons, companies and other entities before litigation is commenced. This is not an exhaustive list; engagement of an experienced mediator, independent of both sides, in any area where a dispute has arisen is frequently valuable in achieving an early and cost effective outcome. As my experience shows, I am well equipped for appointment to such a role.

Doubtless there will be other joining the exclusive club of retired jurists as time progresses and more active judges seek more than golf and gardening.

Of Interest



Judge Judy Facts on LawFuel.com


LawFuel – News To Power Lawyers

Get Your Power Law News

Get the top law news weekly that's fun to read
Powered by Kit

About The Author