Powered by LawFuel – James Hardie’s release to the Australian Stock Exchange yesterday – that it ultimately intends to “cease all manufacturing of products in New Zealand”, at the cost of some 120 Kiwi jobs – is unlikely to stall the class action brought by over 1,000 leaky home owners.
[adrotate banner=”92″]
Adina Thorn, the lawyer leading the action, says the announcement is “concerning” but “not overly surprising” given the history of James Hardie with asbestos in Australia, extensive litigation in that country, and a history of major corporate restructuring.
“We have seen this kind of behaviour before. Now we are seeing a massive downsize of the New Zealand business in the face of significant litigation. Fortunately, our claim is against four other James Hardie companies – three in Australia and the parent company in Ireland. The plaintiffs allege they are each liable.
“If you ask any of the owners – they do not care “which” James Hardie company is legally liable. They just want James Hardie to take responsibility for what they say is designing, manufacturing and selling defective cladding systems and products. They also say that they knew of problems with the products and never said anything, and had a duty to warn”.
“This kind of news gives home owners more stress. Not only do they live in leaky homes in need of recladding and many have mould, they also have health problems, and now have the added worry of “what’s next” with James Hardie. This is when many of the home owners are suffering from significant stress, anxiety and depression”.
The plaintiffs in the class action have a trial in the High Court at Auckland commencing on 3 May 2021 and the trial is due to run for 20 weeks.
For further information please contact:
Adina Thorn Lawyers maryclaire@adinathorn.co.nz +64 9 304 0661
[adrotate banner=”91″]
More on LawFuel
- Judge Loses Judicial Review Over Unseemly Club RowNew Zealand Judicial Conduct Controversy KC Gary Williams opined on the Northern Club brouhaha… Read more: Judge Loses Judicial Review Over Unseemly Club Row
- Judge Slays Dragon-Branded Lawyer’s Marketing Effort
When Legal Branding Goes Too Far Ben Thomson, LawFuel contributing editor In a case… Read more: Judge Slays Dragon-Branded Lawyer’s Marketing Effort - Cahill Adds Leading Technology IP Litigation Team of Three Partners, Including New Practice ChairThe group expands Cahill’s technology footprint and extends jurisdictional capabilities Cahill Gordon & Reindel… Read more: Cahill Adds Leading Technology IP Litigation Team of Three Partners, Including New Practice Chair
- Looking Ahead: Business Impacts of the Trump Administration
Baker McKenzie Trump Administration Report With Donald Trump now in office, Baker McKenzie practitioners… Read more: Looking Ahead: Business Impacts of the Trump Administration - When A Sickie Turns Sticky -A Lawyer’s AFL Adventure Ends in Career Foul Play
Norma Harris In what might be the most expensive football tickets ever purchased, a… Read more: When A Sickie Turns Sticky -A Lawyer’s AFL Adventure Ends in Career Foul Play - An Overview of the Divorce Act in Canada: Things to Consider
No matter the territory or province, the divorce act can impact the dissolution process… Read more: An Overview of the Divorce Act in Canada: Things to Consider - Balancing Academic Responsibilities and Practical Experience in Law SchoolLaw school presents a dual challenge. Students must excel in class while gaining practical… Read more: Balancing Academic Responsibilities and Practical Experience in Law School
