Powered by LawFuel – James Hardie’s release to the Australian Stock Exchange yesterday – that it ultimately intends to “cease all manufacturing of products in New Zealand”, at the cost of some 120 Kiwi jobs – is unlikely to stall the class action brought by over 1,000 leaky home owners.
[adrotate banner=”92″]
Adina Thorn, the lawyer leading the action, says the announcement is “concerning” but “not overly surprising” given the history of James Hardie with asbestos in Australia, extensive litigation in that country, and a history of major corporate restructuring.
“We have seen this kind of behaviour before. Now we are seeing a massive downsize of the New Zealand business in the face of significant litigation. Fortunately, our claim is against four other James Hardie companies – three in Australia and the parent company in Ireland. The plaintiffs allege they are each liable.
“If you ask any of the owners – they do not care “which” James Hardie company is legally liable. They just want James Hardie to take responsibility for what they say is designing, manufacturing and selling defective cladding systems and products. They also say that they knew of problems with the products and never said anything, and had a duty to warn”.
“This kind of news gives home owners more stress. Not only do they live in leaky homes in need of recladding and many have mould, they also have health problems, and now have the added worry of “what’s next” with James Hardie. This is when many of the home owners are suffering from significant stress, anxiety and depression”.
The plaintiffs in the class action have a trial in the High Court at Auckland commencing on 3 May 2021 and the trial is due to run for 20 weeks.
For further information please contact:
Adina Thorn Lawyers maryclaire@adinathorn.co.nz +64 9 304 0661
[adrotate banner=”91″]
More on LawFuel
- How Brad Karp Lost the Plot: David Lat’s Forensic Dissection of the Paul Weiss Chairman’s Downfall
BigLaw • Analysis The Karp Collapse: David Lat Dissects the Emails That Ended an… Read more: How Brad Karp Lost the Plot: David Lat’s Forensic Dissection of the Paul Weiss Chairman’s Downfall - Law Firm Retention Bonuses 2026: How Much Firms Are Really Paying to Keep Their Associates
The war for legal talent never really ended. It just got more expensive with… Read more: Law Firm Retention Bonuses 2026: How Much Firms Are Really Paying to Keep Their Associates - 5 Top Personal Injury Law Firms in Central Oregon Handling Complex Cases 2026Power Briefing: Telare Law, Personal Injury Attorneys Image generated by Gemini An individual facing… Read more: 5 Top Personal Injury Law Firms in Central Oregon Handling Complex Cases 2026
- Sullivan & Cromwell Strengthens London Private Capital Practice With Two HiresLONDON (FEBRUARY 13, 2026) – Sullivan & Cromwell LLP announced today that Patrick Bright and William Needham… Read more: Sullivan & Cromwell Strengthens London Private Capital Practice With Two Hires
- Legal AI’s Quiet Winner – How Affinda Is Scaling While Big Software Stumbles
While public markets flinch at every new AI headline, Melbourne-based Affinda is doing something unfashionable in tech right now: raising money, growing revenue, and selling actual products lawyers use. In a fresh $25 million funding round, Affinda lifted its valuation to $220 million, up from $120 million in mid-2024. The round was led again by Toll Group founder Paul Little, with backing from Ellerston Capital’s Ashok Jacob and former MYOB and REA Group CEO Greg Ellis. No meme tokens. No vaporware. Just document AI doing unglamorous but billable work. From “Legal AI Tool” to AI-Native Infrastructure Affinda isn’t trying to replace lawyers with chatbots. It’s doing something far more dangerous to incumbents: making legal work faster, cheaper and harder to justify billing for inefficiency. - Legal Market Analysis – BigLaw’s Lateral Frenzy Is Reshaping the Market
The Perkins Coie exodus in Seattle signals a permanent shift in the lateral hiring labor market that is changing the way top law firms operate. Lateral hiring is no longer just a tactic but an entire business model. When Perkins Coie lost lawyers to the announcement new offices for Morrison Foerster and McGuireWoods. It was in fact a signal of something structural. The departures came as Perkins Coie prepares for its merger with Ashurst, a combination that will create a global platform of roughly 3,000 lawyers. The timing reveals a pattern that now defines elite legal practice: mergers create opportunity, but they also create instability. And instability is oxygen for competitors. What we are witnessing is not a phase. It is the emergence of lateral acquisition as BigLaw’s dominant growth strategy. The New Economics: Why Firms Are Buying Revenue - What Law Firms Get Wrong About Diversity
Diversity in law is still being discussed like it’s a favour, not a competitive… Read more: What Law Firms Get Wrong About Diversity
