The $1 Billion Case & The Unfolding Litigation Funding & Legal Drama

This page about Pierce Bainbridge law firm is no longer available, but you may see further updated information about law firms by joining our list (below) and receiving the latest law firm news

Read More –

• 
  Trainee To Equity Partner: The 12-Year BigLaw Timeline, Mapped Honestly
  Roughly one in twenty associates who start at a top US firm will make equity partner there. That is the number nobody puts in the recruiting brochure. The brochure says the partnership track is “approximately eight to ten years.” That is technically true and practically misleading — because it describes the timeline of people who finish, not the probability of finishing. The honest answer is that the BigLaw partnership track is a twelve-year funnel with five stages, four exit ramps, and a survival rate that would not pass muster as a clinical trial outcome. Here is what each stage actually looks like. Log in to read timeline . . .
• 
  Panel Games: Revolut’s New Legal Model is a Quarterly Hunger Games for Big Law
  If you’re a partner at a Magic Circle firm currently leaning back in your Herman Miller chair, comforted by the warmth of a three-year panel appointment, you might want to sit up. The fintech disruptor that refuses to play by the rules is, predictably, about to break yours. Revolut, the neobank recently valued at a staggering $45 billion following a secondary share sale (with some internal projections whispering closer to $75 billion), is officially binning the traditional legal panel model. In its place comes “Revolut Partners,” a system designed to treat law firms less like venerable institutions and more like high-performance software vendors. Log in to read more . .
• 
  The Partner Who Signed the Brief: Inside Morgan & Morgan’s $5,000 AI Lesson
  If you wanted a single case to put on the cover of every CLE brochure for the next five years, Wadsworth v. Walmart Inc. would do nicely. A hoverboard explodes in a Wyoming family’s home. The family sues. Their lawyers — from America’s loudest plaintiffs’ firm, no less — file a motion in limine citing nine cases. Eight of them do not exist. They have never existed. They were, in the now-familiar verb of our age, hallucinated. And so on 24 February 2025, U.S. District Judge Kelly H. Rankin handed down what is shaping up to be the defining American sanctions order of the generative-AI era. Rudwin Ayala — the Morgan & Morgan associate who actually fed the brief into the firm’s in-house AI tool, charmingly named MX2.law — lost his pro hac vice admission and was fined $3,000. Log in to read . . .
• 
  Crown Jewel or Holding Pattern? The Meredith Connell Question Won’t Go Away
• Sundaresh Thangavelu named as rising star by New Zealand Law Society’s Property Law Section
• 
  UK Platform Law Firm Setfords Eyes £110m+ Exit as PE-Backed Consultant Model Proves Its Worth
• 
  How a Box of Hong Kong Cupcakes Triggered a $36m Law Partner Meltdown
  Quick question: “If a star rainmaker built ‘their’ office, do they get to secretly take it with them – or does the partnership own everything they touch?” When the Australian Financial Review recently devoted a major feature to “the $36 million box of Hong Kong cupcakes”, it wasn’t really about baked goods – it was about how a high‑performing litigation boutique managed to blow itself up in plain sight. Log in to see what happened . . .
• 
  How Many Lawyers Are in the US? (2026 Statistics)