Daniel Dufner Returns to White & Case as a Partner in Its Mergers & Acquisitions Practice

New York, February 1, 2013 – LawFuel.com – Global law firm White & Case LLP bolsters again its United States Mergers and Acquisitions (M&A) practice with the addition of Daniel Dufner as a partner in the Firm’s New York office. Dufner rejoins White & Case from Linklaters. He had previously been a partner at White & Case from 2004 to 2009.

“We are excited that Dan has decided to rejoin the Firm,” said John Reiss, head of White & Case’s Global M&A Practice. “Our Global M&A practice, particularly in New York, London and Asia, is a key strategic priority for the Firm. We are focused on continuing to grow that practice.”

Dufner joins Mort Pierce and his team of six M&A partners who themselves joined White & Case in 2012. Dufner regularly represents major corporations, such as WellPoint, EchoStar, Dish Network and Blockbuster (now a subsidiary of Dish). He represented WellPoint in its recent US$4.9 billion acquisition of Amerigroup Corporation and has been representing Blockbuster, the DVD and video game rental company, with respect to the administration of Blockbuster’s business in the United Kingdom.

About White & Case
White & Case LLP is a leading global law firm with lawyers in 38 offices in 26 countries. Among the first US-based law firms to establish a truly global presence, we provide counsel and representation in virtually every area of law that affects cross-border business. Our clients value both the breadth of our global network and the depth of our US, English and local law capabilities in each of our regions and rely on us for their complex cross-border transactions, as well as their representation in arbitration and litigation proceedings.


Law school admissions have fallen by nearly 50 per cent since 2004 according to the Law School Admission Council, a trend that is concerning both the universities and the law profession.

Law school lawfuel

Law school admissions have fallen by nearly 50 per cent since 2004 according to the Law School Admission Council, a trend that is concerning both the universities and the law profession.

According to the Washington Post, it’s the clearest indication yet of legal academia’s busted business model. For decades, law schools have invested in expensive but underutilized buildings, faculty and administrators, all in the pursuit of excellence as defined by their accrediting body, the American Bar Association. They passed on the costs to students, who paid with borrowed money, confident that law school was a ticket to a high-paying job. Now those jobs are scarce, and the debt-driven law school “value proposition” is in trouble.

This trend is cause for concern not so much for what it portends in the legal profession but for what it may mean for all colleges and universities. Professional schools have been a modest net contributor to affiliated university revenue, so their plight affects undergraduate education.

More important, the law-school business model is an exaggerated version of all higher ed. If colleges and universities can’t control costs, they could experience the same downward spiral as law schools. The United States may get along with fewer lawyers, but future workforce productivity depends on a vibrant higher-education sector.

Alas, recent data on that front suggest that colleges and universities are barely beginning to face the new realities. On Jan. 16, Moody’s Investors Service issued a “negative outlook” for U.S. higher education. It cited sluggish revenue growth on account of increased tuition sensitivity on the part of students and their families — and increased reluctance to incur debt to pay for college — as well as state budget cutbacks and the rise of online learning alternatives.

About The Author