Is Laughter the Best Medicine for Law Students?

Laughing man

Using humor to teach law is something prescribed as one of the best forms of medicine by a law professor who believes using the “pedagogical power of laughter” can be a hugely underestimated tool when it comes to teaching.

Professor Reed, a clinical law professor at Northwestern University Law School believes humor, properly used, can add to lively classroom discussion and can accomplish “pedagogical goals”.

Everyone, he says quite correctly, (although we sometimes have doubts on this point) can find a funny bone.

If you have ever noticed something offbeat in a case or chuckled at the folly in some legal doctrine, you have the capacity to bring humor to the classroom. Heck, if you’ve ever laughed anywhere at anything in your life then you have that capacity – all it takes is an openness to funny or unusual ideas and a willingness to share them with others.

But he does offers some pointers. He encourages professors to brush up on pop culture and jot down ideas before class. And he also cautions against going overboard with slapstick:

I cannot emphasize this enough: do not be a clown in class; be a professor with a sense of humor. I have learned the hard way that off-topic jokes may get a laugh, but they do not push your teaching mission forward. Students are sophisticated and while they may laugh at the time, if you do too much humor beyond the course syllabus they will wonder if it is a good use of class time.

An interesting and doubtless correct thought from the Professor.

The Law Blog, who reported the advice also offered some classic lawyer jokes, just to get you thinking:

“You’re a high-priced lawyer! If I give you $500, will you answer two questions for me?”
“Sure”, says the attorney. “What’s the second question?”

***

A famous lawyer found himself at heaven’s gates confronting St. Peter. He protested that it was all a mistake: he was only 49, and was far too young to be dead.
“That’s odd,” said St. Peter, “according to the hours you’ve billed, you’re 119 years old.”

***

One day in court, a lawyer fell into a heated argument with the presiding magistrate over a point of law. “You’ve been showing contempt for this court!” the judge finally exclaimed.
“No, Your Honor,” the lawyer replied, “I’ve been trying to conceal it.”

 

 

Read more at the Law Blog


Lawsuit Against Law Firm Over Law Work Outsourcing

Jacoby lawfuel

Outsourcing legal work – or any work – is something law firms are doing with increasing frequency. The biggest firms – think Clifford Chance in India – are doing it and now Jacoby & Meyers are facing a lawsuit over billing work handled by “support companies” owned by some of the current or former partners in the firm.

The lawsuit relates to personal injury settlements using a company called Total Trial Solutions.

That company is allegedly owned by Andrew Finkelstein, who is a partner of both Jacoby & Meyers and Finkelstein & Partners, and Kenneth Oliver, a former partner of both firms.

The suit brings claims of breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract against Jacoby & Meyers, Finkelstein & Partners, Finkelstein and Oliver. The suit also brings an unjust enrichment claim against Total Trial Solutions, Finkelstein and Oliver. The suit seeks actual and punitive damages, disgorgement of ill-gotten gains and fees collected by the defendants as a result of their alleged fiduciary breaches and conflicted transactions.

The named plaintiffs are Nancy Harding, who lives in Rockland County, N.Y., and her son, Jeffrey Harding, who lives in Mahwah, N.J. According to the complaint, both Hardings retained Finkelstein & Partners in connection with separate slip-and-fall injuries and each received a settlement. In both cases, the clients signed retainer agreements giving Finkelstein & Partners a one-third share of the litigation proceeds, and stating that some services related to the case might be provided by companies owned by Finkelstein and Oliver.

The suit was filed on behalf of clients of Jacoby & Meyers or Finkelstein & Partners who were billed for litigation services provided by Total Trial Services or two other companies allegedly owned by Finkelstein and Oliver—MedTrial Solutions and CineTrial Solutions.

The Hardings did not have any dealings with Jacoby & Meyers but that firm shares an office in Newburgh, N.Y., with Finkelstein & Partners, and many of the attorneys listed on Jacoby & Meyers’ website are also listed on the site of Finkelstein & Partners, according to Joseph Santoli, the Ridgewood, N.J., attorney representing the plaintiffs. Jacoby & Meyers is believed to make use of Total Trial and the other companies owned by Finkelstein and Oliver, Santoli said.

Read more: http://www.njlawjournal.com/id=1202668786577/Class-Action-Against-Jacoby-amp-Meyers-Alleges-Deceptive-Billing#ixzz3COzOMgdv

About The Author