The fact that lawyers may be ignored by more tech-savvy industries, leaving them out in the cold, is something that has been identified as a real threat by a legaltech expert this week.
Speaking a an online event, Rick Seabrook, (left) founder of law firm technology consultancy Panoram, said he was unsure whether the legal industry was capable of competing with financial and insurance businesses, which were more adept at attracting disruptors and avoiding using legal services in the traditional way.
Law firms need to have the courage to employ diverse and even ‘abrasive characters’ who can help disrupt the sector and ensure it does not fall behind other, major industries.
He was backed up by former government technology minister Ed Vaizey, who agreed law firms had to avoid recruiting new lawyers who looked like the existing leadership.
“Will legal be able to keep up… Or will they ultimately get designed out of the system?” Seabrook said.
law firms had to be willing to bring in disruptors, who he described as “change agents”
“Think about fintech, think about insure tech, where a lot of those new propositions, new products are actually being developed with the legal contribution already embedded into the systems.”
He said that law firms had to be willing to bring in disruptors, who he described as “change agents”, when they found the world of fintech or similar more exciting and lucrative.
“How do you encourage change agents to come into your industry? At the moment, frankly, very few of them would consider legal as a rich ground for going in and doing something exciting.
“How do we recruit them and then retain them and reward them? They are often quite abrasive people who churn things up a bit, which is what you need in the early phase [of digital transformation].”
Kathy Valentine, director of knowledge and practice innovation at global law firm Dentons in Washington DC, agreed, saying: “These are often not popular people within their organisations.”
Ed Vaizey, who was tech minister between 2010 and 2016 and previously a family law barrister, said the problem with the legal profession embracing disruption and technology was its make-up.
“It’s behind because it is led by people like me: white, middle-class, Oxbridge-educated, middle-aged men, who are not exactly at the forefront of innovation.”
Instead of simply seeking out graduates from prestigious universities who might one day become partner, law firms should have “an element of humility about it” because they would be hiring people who knew a lot more in some respects about “the digital world we now live in than many of the senior partners in that law firm”.
Mr Vaizey, who stood down at last year’s election, said the legal profession needed fresh thinking that came with diversity, but also leadership from government and the courts.
The key, he said, was “radically rethinking about how the law is done because of technology, rather than trying to shoehorn technology into an analogue system”.
Source: Legal Futures
More from LawFuel
- LawList – The Largest Law Firms in BostonBoston is one of the largest legal markets in the US with over 2000 law …
- HMRC Tax Advice For BusinessesSpecialist tax lawyers Kangs Solicitors provide some key tips on tax issues for businesses in …
- Dentons Australia Raids Four Firms For PartnersDentons’ Australian office have acquired six new partners to build their capacity to handle work …
- NZ Marriage Celebrant – 4 Secrets To The Success of Her Majesty’s MarriageRosie Bowie* The sad news of Queen Elizabeth II’s passing and her magnificently staged funeral …
- The Best SEO Service For Law Firms in 2022 (and beyond)How To SEO-Boost Your Law Firm Listing To A Heat-Seeking Client AttractorContents0.1 How To SEO-Boost …
- The Great Law Firm Resignation – Where Will It End?The latest law firm survey from recruitment firm Mahlab shows a major surge in law …
- The Lawyer Exodus & Opportunities To Seek In The Current New Zealand Law Jobs MarketDelayed overseas travel and post-pandemic issues have lead to changes to the legal jobs market …