The Kiwifruit Growers are aggrieved at losing their Court of Appeal case in a decision released today and following an appeal a year ago seeking damages for Government negligence in permitting the PSA disease into the country.
The Court of Appeal decision today allowe the Crown’s appeal on the basis that the Crown had a statutory immunity that precluded liablity for the alleged negligent acts or omissions (the full Court of Appeal press release is here).
The Court said it would have found no duty of care to exist in the particular circumstances. While there was sufficient proximity for a duty of care to exist, policy factors, in particular indeterminacy, meant it would not be fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care in the circumstances.
The PSA outbreak in 2009 devasted the kiwifruit industry and the Kiwifruit Claim, financed by legal funder LPG Group, has said they will now appeal to the Supreme Court.
Kiwifruit Claim Chairman John Cameron said that growers are aggrieved by today’s Court of Appeal decision that finds the Government was responsible for the 2009 PSA outbreak but is not liable for the losses. He confirmed they will appeal the decision in the Supreme Court.
“The Court of Appeal held that MPI was negligent in allowing a high-risk shipment of pollen anthers infected with PSA from China into New Zealand. But they found the Government does not owe a duty of care to ordinary New Zealanders and can’t be held liable for its actions, simply because it’s the Government,” said John Cameron, Kiwifruit Claim Chairman.
“The decision by the Court of Appeal relied upon an interpretation of the Crown Proceedings Act that effectively means the Government can’t be held to account for any wrongdoing.
“We believe this interpretation is wrong. It is both logical and reasonable that the Government should be held responsible for its actions, and those of its employees, where it is clear that significant harm and losses have resulted from their negligence. This is no different to the law that allows us to hold local councils and private business to account for their negligence,” said Mr Cameron.
“While our legal team need to analyse this latest decision, this is far from over. We will appeal this decision to the Supreme Court,” said Mr Cameron. “We would like to acknowledge the hard work from our legal team and the financial support provided by litigation funders, LPF Group, who have enabled this case to proceed this far.”
>> Kiwifruit claim costs million
>> Litigation Funding Power Lawyer
Recently on LawFuel
- How to Build a Strong Case for Municipal Worker Injuries in 2026: A Step-by-Step GuidePower Briefing: Ryan Injury LawImage generated by GeminiThe reality of municipal work is often… Read more: How to Build a Strong Case for Municipal Worker Injuries in 2026: A Step-by-Step Guide
- Why Motorcycle Accident Injuries Often Require Complex ClaimsArticle source: Teague Law, Motorcycle injury law GAEllijay is known for its scenic mountain… Read more: Why Motorcycle Accident Injuries Often Require Complex Claims
- How a Nursing Home Abuse Lawyer Proves NeglectArticle source: Schenk Nursing Home Abuse Law, GAAtlanta is known for its vibrant neighborhoods,… Read more: How a Nursing Home Abuse Lawyer Proves Neglect
- Paul Hawstingw Launches Enhanced Brussels PresencePaul Hastings today announced the launch of its enhanced Brussels platform with leading antitrust… Read more: Paul Hawstingw Launches Enhanced Brussels Presence
- Is This The Billable Hour’s Last Stand? Anthropic’s Top Lawyer Thinks So
The legal profession has survived recessions, regulatory upheavals and the occasional partner meltdown. But the next threat to BigLaw’s favourite revenue model may come from something far less dramatic. A machine that reads faster than any associate and which could spell the end of the infamous ‘billable hour’, which has been touted as being in its end time for some time. According to Jeff Bleich, general counsel at AI company Anthropic, (pictured) the traditional billable hour could soon be on borrowed time.
