A birthday bash for the Wellington branch of the Law Society has reportedly resulted in a number of upset and uncomfortable participants as a result of the attendance by a former Russell McVeagh partner who is reportedly under investigation by the Law Society for his role in the now infamous summer intern issues that turned the profession upside down.
Stuff reported that the event, which was a $165-a-head 150th commemorative dinner for the branch, held at Te Papa, was a cause for further discomfort for many in attendance when a speech was made that directly referred to the #Metoo issues that first broke in the capital.
The Law Society will not confirm that there is a current investigation underway, but #Metoo activist Olivia Wensley, one of the so-called ‘Power Women’ in the New Zealand #Metoo movement, confirmed to the site that a complaint was made about the man.
It is this secrecy that Ms Wensley and others say further detracts from the Law Society’s efficacy in such matters, quite apart from providing some resolution for the victims of abuse.
“The whole process sends a message to victims of ‘don’t bother complaining – nothing will happen’,” Wensley said.
“The victims must be extremely frustrated by the delays. Because of confidentiality they won’t even be able to speak out about their frustration – it is appalling.”
The secrecy of the Law Society complaints process meant it could go on for years without a decision, she said.
Justice Minister Andrew Little recently said he had met with the Law Society several times in recent years, since two reports came out over the sexual assault and other issues of misconduct within the profession.
The #Metoo Power Women in the Legal Profession
More from LawFuel . .
- Antonia Watson Exits As ANZ Doubles Down On NZ$125m CCCFA Appeal
- NZ Lawyer News – Health law heavyweight Dr Jonathan Coates joins Britomart Chambers
- New Zealand Legal Tech Company Just Launched An AI Workspace For In-House Teams Globally
- Bell Gully Bought Harvey Firm-Wide. The Supreme Court Just Made That Look PrescientIn Jones v Family Court at Whangārei [2026] NZSC 1, the Supreme Court used a published judgment to call out a litigant for citing case law that an AI application had invented. Meanwhile, Bell Gully had become the first large New Zealand firm to roll out Harvey AI to its entire 200-plus lawyer team. What the Supreme Court Said Justices Ellen France, Stephen Kós and Forrest Miller dismissed Mr Jones’s leave application after identifying that submissions cited several authorities that “appear to have been hallucinated by an Artificial Intelligence (AI) application”. Specific examples included “Teddy v Police [2015] NZSC 62” and “Baird v R [2013] NZSC 120” — real case names combined with incorrect citations, while four genuine cases were misused to support propositions they did not stand for. The issue for New Zealand law firms. Log in to read . .
- Father and Son Law Partners Fined for ‘Grave’ Client Conflicts in Palmerston North
- Why Law Firms Feel Busier Than Ever, But Still Lack Pipeline Confidence
Confidentiality is very standard in any professional complaint process.
It has nothing to do with whether ‘nothing will happen”.
I don’t understand why it would add to delay either.
Confidentiality, after a complaint is made out is surely the real issue to be confronted.