Slavery has once again become front-and-centre of issues for many companies, but it has not been something that until now has resonated with New Zealand businesses.
However, new Australian legislation will ensure that companies need to carefully examine their operations and supply chain to look at working conditions that may be linked to modern slavery.
Chapman Tripp lawyer Nicola Swan says that the Australian Modern Slavery Act requires companies with more than AUD$100 million (NZD$107 million) turnover to report any evidence of worker exploitation to either their own organisation or the government in a move that could force around 500 New Zealand businesses to publicly disclose their risk to modern slavery practices within their organisation.
This includes companies that are registered in Australia with revenues that exceed A$100m or businesses that are part of a major Australian company’s supply chain.
The so-called ‘slavery statements’ require businesses to explain the entity’s structure, operation and entire supply chain, and acknowledge working conditions that may contribute or are linked to modern slavery, which includes forced or bonded labour.
For example, if a business based in Australia sold products manufactured in a factory in Thailand, the business would have to review the working conditions of the factory and publicly disclose them.
The first set of statements are due in late December.
Swan said when they become public they could shine a light on working conditions within New Zealand businesses.
“There’s going to be increasing pressure coming down the supply chain and questions are going to be asked to make sure that none of the businesses feeding into them have got modern slavery in their own business.
“That’s where I think we’re going to see a lot more New Zealand companies being caught by having to answer these sorts of questions in a much more specific way then they might have.”
Swan said New Zealand was not immune to cases of modern slavery.
In March, for instance, a Hastings-based Samoan chief was found guilty of 10 charges in human trafficking and 13 charges in dealing in slaves.
Swan said there were powers in the act which were designed to incentivise businesses to publish slavery statements.
“There are some very clever powers in the act whereby the minister can request information about why you haven’t published a statement, and the minister then has the power to publish the name of the entity which hasn’t complied with the legislation.”
Swan expected the New Zealand government to follow the example set by Australia and institute its own modern slavery statement policy in the next few years.
Read More on LawFuel – One of the Net’s First and Best Law News Sites
- Andrew PetersenNew Entrant – Managing one of the ‘Golden Triangle’ top 3 law firms sees Andrew Petersen hit the …
- Perjury Against Hollywood Executives Leads to ChargesThe $50 Million Suit Filed by ROVIER CARRINGTON in the Southern District of New York Included Fabricated Claims …
- LegalTech in the Courtroom: Will Technology Rule The Future Courtrooms?Norma Harris *- The evolution of technology is positively impacting each industry. From retail to hospitality to finances, …
- Covid Court – How Covid is Changing Face(s) of Court Trials . . And JuriesAs New Zealand’s alert levels edge downwards the changing face of trials and court work has entered the …
- 7 Law Firm SEO Power Tips To Create Law Firm Content Your Clients Will DevourOur Cheat Sheet To Generate Compelling Content For Your Law Firm That Provides Top Legal SEO Power https://www.searchenginejournal.com/best-seo-content-tips/284899/#close …
- LegalTech – Wilson Sonsini To Automate the Process for Companies Going PublicAutomatically Generated “WS-1” Form Benefits Pre-IPO Companies by Eliminating Low-Value Work From the Drafting Process – Wilson Sonsini …
- The Judge Who Queried The Obvious: Why Send Drug Users to the Drug Suppliers?It’s a bit like coals-to-Newcastle, or having the Taliban come to teach us how to educate more women. …