They may be relics these days, but for barrister Ray Broomhall, the collection of wigs is part of a desire to retain a slice of legal history. But at the same time this barrister has successfully fought against something far more modern than the wigs of old.
As wigs are now part of legal history in most of both Australian and New Zealand courts, the Tasmanian barrister recognises that they also represent the legal characters who wore them.
Mr Broomhall said he would like to get his hands on former justice of the High Court Michael Kirby’s wig.
“I’d love to have one of his wigs — whether his barrister wig or one that he wore in the High Court. That would be to me the ultimate,” he said.
He would not put a price on how much he has spent on his unusual collection.
“It’s not the wig itself — it’s the people behind the wig,” he said.
“The story behind each wig is absolutely amazing, and they’re priceless when you think of the stories behind them.”
Taking pride of place in his collection is the wig worn by Thomas Strangman when he successfully prosecuted Indian civil rights leader Mahatma Gandhi for sedition in 1922.
“There was actually a big court case that said you can’t trade in human body parts, so barristers were walking around with human-hair wigs and they found they had to go to horsehair,” Mr Broomhall said.
While the more modern wigs follow a pattern which includes a set guide of the number of side curls for barristers and back curls for judges, each wig is subtly different.
The wigs’ individual quirks give a special insight into the wearer.
Full-bottomed wigs for judges have been phased out — even for ceremonial occasions — in Tasmania.
The now-retired wigs are still housed at the Supreme Court of Tasmania in Hobart. Registrar Jim Connolly is the keeper of Supreme Court of Tasmania judges’ wigs.
“They’re part of our legal history,” Mr Connolly said.
“These wigs are handmade. They are made of horsehair and they are fitted to the particular judge’s head that they need to adorn.
The Barrister’s Fight Against 5G
Barrister Broomhall is not just about collecting and retaining a slice of legal history however. He has also spearheaded a successful legal fight against the introduction of the 5G network in Australia with his ‘Say No’ campaign.
The basis for the Broomhall opposition to 5G is the dangers alleged to emanate from magnetic fields and he has spoken widely across Australia about the dangers and the opposition to the implementation of the 5G network.
Source: ABC
Other Law News
- Australia’s ‘Ones to Watch’ in the Young Best Lawyer ListThe ‘Best Lawyer’s list for 2022 has been published with a first-time list of some of the younger lawyers who …
Australia’s ‘Ones to Watch’ in the Young Best Lawyer List Read More »
- Google Alphabet’s Top Lawyer’s Earnings – They Took a Dive to Just $15 MillionLawFuel Law Star J Kent Walker has had another good year pulling in nearly $15 million after a busy year …
Google Alphabet’s Top Lawyer’s Earnings – They Took a Dive to Just $15 Million Read More »
- Law Job Site Reports on Shake Up in US Law School RankingsNew law job website LawJob1 has reported on the major shakeup in the rankings of US law schools following a …
Law Job Site Reports on Shake Up in US Law School Rankings Read More »
- Who Are The Oligarchs Lawyers And The ‘Lawfare’ Claims Made In Their Names?Oligarch lawyers in the UK are named and lawfare claims face increased scrutiny
- Immigration Law Firm Alexandra Lozano – Serving Clients in 50 States – New Listing on LawFuel DirectoryLatino focus and smart marketing helps immigration law firm deliver case-winning service Alexandra Lozano Immigration Law works to amplify its …
- The Fighting Justice – Ukrainian Judge Takes Up ArmsAmong the many thousands taking up arms against the Russian invaders in Ukraine are many lawyers and others, including a …
The Fighting Justice – Ukrainian Judge Takes Up Arms Read More »
- The Lawyers Who Share in Prince Andrew’s Settlement SpoilsThe news that Prince Andrew has settled his highly publicized and damaging sexual abuse case involving Virginia Giuffre is good …
The Lawyers Who Share in Prince Andrew’s Settlement Spoils Read More »
- Black Barrister Decries Ridiculous ‘Insensitive’ WigsThe barristers’ horsehair wigs have been around since the 17th century, but a leading black barrister claims they are ‘culturally …
Black Barrister Decries Ridiculous ‘Insensitive’ Wigs Read More »
- Charlotte Bellis’ Auckland Barrister’s New Legal SpecialtyAuckland barrister Tudor Clee, who has been assisting journalist Charlotte Bellis with her attempts to return home to give birth …
Charlotte Bellis’ Auckland Barrister’s New Legal Specialty Read More »
- Bankside Chambers Flashy Makeover
- Associates Promoted at LangtonHudsonButcher
- Clifford Chance – The growing risk of group litigation and class actions
- Four Charged by US Attorney Over Multi-Billion Dollar Collapse of Archegos Capital Management
- The Legal Ladies Adding A Fresh, Gender-Balanced Addition To “Footie”
This article is inaccurate. There is no legal precedent against emitters of EME in Australia. The first case tested the Maroochydore magistrates court Jan-20
was dismissed by the judge who referred to the “method” as “incompetent”.
This method did also not stop the TPG roll-out in Australia. It was halted due to the Huawei ban and the ACCC initially blocking the merger between TPG and VHA. Now that the merger can proceed, the rollout of small cells will resume.
I did a workshop with Ray having heard about his loss in the courts in Queensland. I am disappointed as I can’t see how any of the methodologys he suggested could be used. Am i right.? This question relates to 5G
That’s right – it’s giving those concerned false hope