Lawyer John Tamihere claimed his background as a lawyer helped in his obtaining of a settlement over defamatory claims made by NZME-owned Newstalk ZB host Mike Hosking.
[adrotate banner=”95″]
NZ Herald Pic. Photo: RNZ / Anneke Smith
Tamihere received his Court-ordered apology in the High Court, read by lawyer Alan Ringwood, Bell Gully media lawyer and litigator. Ringwood said it accepted Te Pou Matakana was entitled to receive the funds and pay out the sums that it did to its shareholders. The radio station then apologised over comments Hosking made implying the Māori Party co-leader had personally benefited from Whānau Ora funding to the tune of $600,000 which was not the case.
Hosking apologised on the air today.
The decision of Justice Lang last September.
“You can’t hold your head up so you have to defend yourself. I’m lucky enough to be a trained lawyer with enough resources to defend myself; a lot of Māori don’t,” Tamihere said.
“What I can say is that contribution of some significance will be made to the Māori Party election campaign and you can thank Mike Hosking for that.”
Today’s apology is about comments Hosking made about payments that had been made by the North Island Whānau Ora commissioning agency Te Pou Matakana in December 2018.
Te Pou Matakana had received funds from the Ministry of Māori Development, Te Puni Kōkiri, and had paid that money out to its shareholders.
“The way in which the item was worded could have been taken to mean that John Tamihere personally benefitted from the payments.
“Newstalk ZB accepts that Tamihere did not benefit personally from the payments and sincerely apologises to John Tamihere,” Ringwood said.
Outside court Tamihere said he hoped Hosking and his bosses had learnt racially stereotyping others was wrong.
“I think it sends a message to mainstream broadcasters, particularly very powerful brands, that racial stereotyping is not right because it casts suspicion on all Māori around financial transactions and it’s just not right.”
He said he had offered to resolve the dispute “the Kiwi way” with an apology over a beer but had to take it to court to clear his name.
“You’ve got to hold your mana in your communities. You can’t walk around you communities up and down the country with them believing that you’ve got your fingers in their till. That was the allegation.
Read More LawFuel NZ News Here
- The OpenAI Defense: Inside the Wachtell Trial Team That Just Beat Elon Musk
While Elon Musk’s legal team tried to transform a federal courtroom in Oakland, California into an existential debate about the fate of human civilization and a “stolen charity,” Sam Altman’s defenders quietly built a procedural guillotine. A unanimous nine-member federal advisory jury took less than two hours to reject all of Musk’s claims against OpenAI, CEO Sam Altman, and President Greg Brockman, which presumably was both surprising and disappointing for the multi-billionaire. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers immediately adopted the verdict from the bench, dismissing the case in full. The same statute-of-limitations finding wiped out Musk’s aiding-and-abetting claim against Microsoft, an early backer of OpenAI’s for-profit arm. Log in to the the lawyer profiles . . . - A Complete Guide to How Contingency Fee Agreements Work in Injury Cases
- Understanding the Difference Between Contested and Uncontested Divorce
- What Executors Must Do During Probate Administration
- From 40 Hours To 4: Is AI Forcing A $200 Billion Rewrite Of The BigLaw Billable Hour?
