
You have no doubt heard the term Biglaw, but may not be able to place your finger on an exact definition. You are not alone in that.
Biglaw is an industry-specific nickname for high-revenue law firms with large headcounts. It can also refer to smaller firms that pay their lawyers a market rate salary, or even a medium-sized outfit with wide, international reach and notoriety.
All of these types of firms are typically headquartered in major US cities, like Los Angeles, New York, and Chicago, with multiple branches in smaller markets.
And, most notably, lawyers who work in Biglaw can expect to be paid based on the Cravath scale.
The Cravath Scale

The Cravath Scale, an offshoot of the Cravath system, is named after Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP, the firm which is generally considered the authority on setting associate salaries. Its compensatory functions include factors like the number of years out of law school and particular law school classes, among others.
Lawyers on this pay scale not only earn the same salary but can also anticipate receiving the same annual market bonus. Based on the lockstep and closely monitored structure of the scale, if one firm offers an associate a higher salary, other firms tend to follow suit. But while this scale is based on a platform of consistency, changes have been experienced throughout the years.
To get a better understanding of how the Biglaw salary scale operates on a year-to-year basis, consider some examples of the history of trends certain law associates have experienced.
First Year Candidates
Needless to say, when fresh out of law school, successful first-year candidates have much to prove to the firms that take them on: long hours, dedicated work, limited time-off. But over the years, the take-home pay figures these associates earn may surprise you.
In 2006, about a year before the Great Recession, first-year associates in Biglaw firms earned an average salary of $145,000––with an additional $35,000 in bonuses, for a total of $180,000 (adjusted for inflation, this number is roughly $227,780).
. . in post-recession America, first-year associates earned about $5,000 less in 2009 than what the same grade of lawyers would earn ten years later.
Joshua Holt
By comparison, a first-year associate in 2019 earned $190,000 in salary and a further $15,000 in bonuses, for a total of $205,000. This would indicate that bonuses were higher pre-recession and have since decreased despite an increase in salary.
Compare these factors to the year at the end of the Great Recession. In 2009, first-year lawyers were paid, on average, $160,000 base salary, plus $7,500 in annual bonuses––for a total of $167,500. That same number, adjusted for inflation, is roughly $199,136. Therefore, in post-recession America, first-year associates earned about $5,000 less in 2009 than what the same grade of lawyers would earn ten years later. Additionally, a first-year lawyer in 2006 earned roughly $22,000 more than a first-year lawyer in 2019.
Mid-Tier Associates
Let’s take a look at another tier. Using the same dates, consider the salaries of mid-level associates. In 2006 (remember: a pre-recession year), a fifth-year lawyer working at a Biglaw firm earned a $200,000 salary and an additional $55,000 in bonuses for a total of $255,000. When adjusted for inflation, that figure is about $322,689.
Again, by comparison, a fifth-year associate in 2019 received a base salary of $280,000, this time with an additional $80,000 in bonuses, for a total of $360,000. Once we revisit a post-recession America, the numbers continue to demonstrate a shift. In 2009, fifth-year lawyers earned $230,000 in salary, with $25,000 in annual bonuses, for a total of $255,000. Adjusted for inflation: $303,162.
The Senior Associate
To fully grasp the impact of the salary scale, there is one last tier to consider: the senior associate. In 2007, lawyers in their eighth year of practice with Biglaw firms, took home $280,000 in salary and $110,000 in bonuses, totaling $390,000 (or $480,292 when adjusted for inflation). Two years later, the salary is the same (at $280,000) and the bonuses make a sharp drop down to $30,000 (for a total of $310,000––$368,550 with inflation).
By 2019, eighth-year lawyers are up to $345,000 in salary, plus around $100,000 in bonuses, for a total annual take-home pay of $445,000.
As you’ll notice, one consistent trend throughout the nearly fifteen-year timeframe is the significant decrease in bonus amounts for lawyers at all class levels during the recession years, followed by a sizable return to larger numbers in most recent years.
The Top Tier Firms
So, while there appear to be fluctuations within the Biglaw pay scale, there benefits to joining a top-tier firm are still numerous. Although salaries and bonuses garner most of the spotlight, Biglaw associates receive additional perks, including free meals for working late, as well as reimbursement for travel, entertaining clients and the all-important bar expenses.
Now that you have a better understanding of Biglaw––the pluses, the negatives, the inevitable economic impact(s)––would you still consider it worth the grade?
Author Bio

Joshua Holt is the publisher of BigLawInvestor and an associate at Goodwin Procter LLP. He may be contacted through LinkedIn and on Twitter.
- AI Law Firm Scores UK Courtroom First

- The ‘Year Zero’ Pivot That Tripled This Law Firm’s Revenue
Changing the traditional law firm model is generating a lot of talk these days, but what can change for law firms when they seriously alter the model can turn a moribund operation into something like a high-growth startup. All of which is what happened with Olliers Solicitors in the UK, which went from £2m to a massive £6.5m in annual fee income. Log in to read more . . - Skadden Hires Former Akin Lawyers to Boost Investment Management Group

- Freshfields Add M&A Lawyer in Munich

- The Magic Circle Just Got Replaced. Four Of The New Five Are American

- New Women in Law Report Shows ‘Pressure Points’ Warns of Unsustainable Work and Exit Risk

- Ex-Legends Global GC Adam Lister Launches Specialist Sports and Infrastructure Law Firm

Read More on LawFuel
- Morgan Lewis Joined By Gemma Roberts in London

- How US Heavyweights Hijacked London’s Legal Economics
Law.com International’s latest UK revenue‑per‑lawyer rankings add to growing evidence that London’s top‑end legal market is no longer defined by the Magic Circle alone. Instead, a small group of elite US firms have carved out a parallel “New York–style” market in the City, where profit per partner and revenue per lawyer for firms like Lathams sit at levels most UK rivals struggle to match. For years, the line in London was that City lawyers billed like New Yorkers but were paid like Londoners. That joke looks increasingly dated. - America’s Biggest Personal Injury Firm Eyes Billion-Dollar Private Equity Deal — and a Future IPO
e firm that built its empire on highway billboards and the populist slogan “For the People” is now talking to Wall Street. Morgan & Morgan, the largest personal injury law firm in the United States, has hired JPMorgan to explore a minority stake sale that could raise more than $1 billion and pave the way for a public listing years from now. Morgan & Morgan founder John Morgan, a Florida-based billionaire and political donor, confirmed he was exploring deal options in a statement to Bloomberg Law, describing the discussions as “purely exploratory” with no immediate plan or timeline in place. “We’re simply listening to people smarter than us and working to understand the pros and cons,” he told BloombergLaw. The story, first reported by the Financial Times and subsequently confirmed by Reuters and Bloomberg Law, lands as a landmark moment for the US legal services industry, which has long resisted outside capital while watching adjacent professional services sectors transform under private equity ownership. Log in to read . . . - The LawFuel Tomatometer: the US law Firms that Lawyers Actually Want to Work For
Forget the Vault 100. Forget the AmLaw 100. Especially forget the breathless rankings that measure law firm “prestige” by how many billionaires a firm represents or how many billions it bills. Those lists tell you who the market thinks is elite. They don’t tell you whether the lawyers inside those buildings are happy, burnt out, mentored, or quietly updating their LinkedIn profiles at 11pm on a Tuesday. So we built something different. Call it the LawFuel Tomatometer — a composite “freshness score” for US law firms that aggregates what associates and midlevel lawyers actually say about their own employers, drawn from the most credible lawyer-driven surveys in the industry. And in 2026, the results are telling a very different story than the prestige rankings. Modernlawfirm How the Tomatometer works Rotten Tomatoes works because it aggregates. One critic might love a film and another might hate it, but pool 200 reviews and you get a signal that’s hard to fake. We applied the same logic to law firms. The Tomatometer score for each firm is a weighted composite of five lawyer-centric data sources: Source Weight What it measures Vault Best Law Firms to Work For 2027 45% Direct associate ratings across 12 quality-of-life categories (50 firms ranked, survey Oct 2025–Jan 2026) American Lawyer Midlevel Associates Survey 2025 25% 3rd–5th year associates at ~70 firms rate 12 satisfaction factors AmLaw A-List 2025 15% Composite of associate satisfaction, pro bono, revenue per lawyer, and diversity (top 20 firms scored on 100-point scale) BTI Associate Satisfaction A-Listers 2026 10% Independent survey of 5,000+ associate responses on mentoring, growth, and partner investment Glassdoor + qualitative signals 5% Sentiment from public review sites, Reddit r/biglaw, Above the Law reporting We deliberately excluded the Vault 100 prestige rankings, AmLaw 100 revenue tables, and Chambers practice rankings. Prestige and profitability are easy to measure and well documented elsewhere. The Tomatometer is about something rarer: what it feels like to actually work there. Log in to see the most-favored law firms . . . - Mishcon’s Dubai Office Move

- Winston Taylor Launches Another Big Law Brand

- BigLaw’s AI Arms Race Just Escalated As Kirkland & Ellis Puts $500 Million Behind Its Own Generative AI Platform
The legal tech arms race just moved up a weight class. Kirkland & Ellis, the world’s highest‑grossing law firm, has set aside an eye‑watering $500 million to build its own proprietary generative AI platform, rather than relying on the same off‑the‑shelf tools everyone else can buy. The strategy, revealed by firm chair Jon Ballis and first reported by the Financial Times, marks a deliberate pivot away from simply licensing commercial software. Ballis says the firm expects to spend more than $100 million this year alone on custom AI services, with hundreds of millions more to follow over the next three to four years – roughly 1% of Kirkland’s annual revenue. Log in to read . . .