
John Bowie – A growing number of law firms – including some of the biggest and richest in the country – are applying for the Government subsidy package, which may send observer eyeballs into orbit given their million dollar earnings.
The Government subsidy is there to protect jobS, which is all well and good (although when the subsidies and jobs disappear the Government will be facing a sea of bloodshot looks from an angry electorate), but it is surprising that some of the largest law firms need to “shore up their balance sheets” as BusinessDesk described it.
These are firms that work on healthy margins, generate substantial earnings and service the largest organisations in New Zealand. They are also professionally managed with substantial levels of executive support as befits successful business operations anywhere.
“. . Some of these firms make $1m plus a year per partner and are also aggressively cutting other costs to protect profit
Law firm CEO
They are also able to aggressively cut costs to preserve their margins and many are working to do so.
It is therefore surprising that their balance sheets need “shoring up” in such short order. And the ‘shoring’ has been a shade under $12 million for the largest eight firms listed below.
More significantly perhaps, how many of these major firms (and there are a growing list of mid-sized and small firms clamouring for the subsidy also) need to be able to see a 30 per cent drop in income. Moreso with some firms seeing an increase in their April-to-April figures.
One firm CEO told us that the applications are surprising from a number of the applicants – Simpson Grierson, Bell Gully, Minter Ellison and Duncan Cotterill being among them – “and seems to fly in the face of the purpose and spirit” of the subsidy,” as he said.
After all, the legal business achieve 30-45 per cent profit margins with reduced costs so where is the dramatic one-third falloff?
“These firms are doing it on projections and I’m not sure how they get to that.”
“When we apply April numbers to May (so comparing a poor month with one of our best) we are still down less than 20 per cent – not great but not 30 per cent.”
The notable firms with payouts to date include Simpson Grierson ($2,335,108.80); Minter Ellison ($2,069,265.60); Bell Gully ($1,810,718.40); Meredith Connell ($1,639,178.40); Duncan Cotterill ($1,488,727.20); Lane Neave ($1,116,158.40); Anthony Harper ($896,870.40); Wynn Williams ($731,078.40);
Smaller Firms
Among the smaller firms are Morrison Kent ($567,938.40); Gibson Sheat ($435,746.40); Sharp Tudhope ($314,872.80); MDS Law ( $210,888.00); Rainey Collins ($198,110.40); Willis Legal ($250,236.00); Webb Farry ($196,828.80); Downie Stewart ($184,140.00); The Law Shop ($77,325.60);
Legal Aid List
And included in the list is Legal Aid gold star winner in the LawFuel Legal Aid ‘Power List’, Sonja Cooper ($108,184.80); Tamaki Legal ($127,903.20); Thomas Dewar ($222,117.60); Gowing & Co ($77,325.60).
The High Trust Scheme
None of this is to say the monies paid are paid incorrectly or under some wrong pretense, rather that so many law firms have been so quick to rely upon it in a manner suggesting a financial fragility that surely eludes many who have gone through some of the best times in the Country’s history with resounding partner returns.
As Bell Gully, one of the Big Law recipients, wrote in one of their recent COVID firm updates, “the scheme continues to be described as a “high trust” model, and employers need to be careful to ensure that they can satisfy all of the criteria.”
Ever ready to provide their Covid updates on subsidies, employment and related legal issues, it is very apparent that lawyers are also equally fast in recognising a sense of perceived entitlement for their own operations, too.
[adrotate banner=”85″]
Recently on LawFuel
- Record £534m PE Cash Floods UK Law Firms With AI As the Rocket Fuel
If you’re a lawyer watching your firm’s P&L or thinking about the next tech upgrade, here’s the headline you can’t ignore: private equity poured a record £534 million into UK law firms in 2024, which is a chunky 42% jump from £377m the year before. Over the past five years that’s more than £1.2 billion of fresh capital heading into the sector. - The New Chapter for Mallesons And Why the Australian Firm Chose Independence After 14 Years with KWM

- No Timesheets, Pure Trial Focus – How This Litigation Boutique Rewrote the BigLaw Rulebook in Just 10 Years
What happens when elite trial lawyers walk away from BigLaw’s billable-hour machine and build a firm laser-focused on taking cases all the way to verdict? You get Wilkinson Stekloff—a lean, highly effective trial boutique that has quietly become one of the most respected names in high-stakes litigation, without ever sending a single traditional timesheet to a client. Log in to read more . . - RollOnFriday Drops the 2026 Career Development Rankings – Where UK Lawyers Actually Get Ahead
If you’re a lawyer who’s ever stared at the partnership ladder and wondered whether it’s actually bolted to the wall or just an optical illusion designed to keep you billing, RollOnFriday has done you a quiet favour. Its latest Best Law Firms to Work At 2026 survey – drawing on thousands of anonymous responses from lawyers and support staff across the UK market – zeroes in on career development satisfaction. This is the category that cuts through the glossy recruitment brochures and “we invest in our people” slogans, revealing who actually delivers clear progression routes, meaningful mentoring, early client exposure and merit-based advancement rather than vague promises and political games. Log in to read more . . - NZ Legal Market 2026: Five Findings Law Firms Can’t Ignore

- NZ Law Firms’ Best Year Since Before COVID — And The Five Threats That Could End It

- Why Baker McKenzie’s Major Job Cuts Send Shivvers Down Lawyers’ Spines
The job cuts that sent 700 Baker McKenzie employees home in February has sent major ripples around law firms everywhere. The cuts, affecting less than 10% of Baker McKenzie’s total support workforce, touched nearly every non-lawyer function across every office. This is the kind of story that makes managing partners and chief operating officers sit up straight, because it’s not about associate headcount or NQ retention. It’s about the infrastructure that keeps a modern firm running. Log in to read more . . .