
[adrotate banner=”107″]
Auckland lawyer Adina Thorn is planning a class action against the Christchurch promoters of the Penrich Investment Fund, currently being investigated by the Serious Fraud Office.
What staggered me was that Adina herself was an investor in the fund. I say that as she’s quoted by the Herald saying Penrich “billed itself as making bets on interest and foreign exchange movements.”
For God’s sake, that’s absolutely no different than offering to make bets on behalf of “investors” on race-horses. Far from investing, instead it’s gambling in which for every winner there’s a corresponding loser.
The Penrich promoters, according to the reports, may have misrepresented their size, financial strength and past performance, all offences, albeit basically puffery.
But the salient fact remains that punters knowingly gave them money to speculate on their behalves, which they did and seemingly picked the wrong horses.
Unless it can be shown that in fact, they made no bets and instead pocketed their punters’ funds, Adina will simply be throwing good money after bad.
[adrotate banner=”107″]
- MinterEllison Slashing Graduate Jobs: Is AI Replacing Junior Lawyers?

- NZ Lawyer News – Cavell Leitch Recruits former Minters Partner to Launch Wellington Office

- Doing the Mahi on Maiki: How TVNZ Tried to Bury Its Own Scandal

- NZ Law – Chapman Tripp’s New Podcast Series

- Hamilton Law Firm Fined $60K for AML Breaches and Obstruction
- ANZ’s CCCFA Defence: The Dog Ate My Compliance Calculator

- Winston Peters Disavows Key Claim in Attorney-General’s Letter – Judicial Conduct Panel Report on Judge Ema Aitken
In a significant procedural footnote to New Zealand’s first full Judicial Conduct Panel inquiry, Winston Peters has formally disavowed a specific statement attributed to him in a letter sent by then-Attorney-General Judith Collins to Chief Justice Helen Winkelmann. The revelation is contained in the Judicial Conduct Panel’s report released on 10 April 2026 into the conduct of acting District Court Judge Ema Aitken, which we have reported previously on several occasions, as befits hearings of rowdy judicial goings-on in salubrious surroundings. Log in to read . .