Briefing

Australian Directors Caught Between a Rock and A Hard Place

Director

Clyde & Co – A recent Federal Court of Australia judgment highlights the predicament faced by directors being pursued in civil proceedings when there is the prospect that they may be facing criminal prosecution for offences arising out of substantially the same conduct. Background This scenario is most frequently encountered in the context of civil

Australian Directors Caught Between a Rock and A Hard Place Read More »

The Chinese Vitamin C Case – Courts’ Need to Show “Deferrence” To Foreign Government Parties in US Courts

Chinaflag

Sidley.com – The Second Circuit reversed a jury verdict of US$147 million after trebling and dismissed antitrust claims against a Chinese manufacturer of vitamin C, ruling that the case should have been dismissed by the district court on a motion to dismiss, which was filed just over 10 years earlier. The district court had permitted

The Chinese Vitamin C Case – Courts’ Need to Show “Deferrence” To Foreign Government Parties in US Courts Read More »

OSHA Joins the SEC in Attacking Confidentiality and Other Provisions in Private Settlement Agreements

Labor

Littler – On September 15, 2016, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) released new policy guidelines for its review of private settlement agreements presented to the agency for approval in whistleblowing actions.1 OSHA issued these guidelines based on its concern that certain confidentiality and other provisions in settlement agreements may unlawfully restrict or

OSHA Joins the SEC in Attacking Confidentiality and Other Provisions in Private Settlement Agreements Read More »

All in the Family – Sales of “Patent Families”

Davis Polk –  Technology companies routinely conduct patent sales, whether through high-profile auctions like the one recently proposed by Yahoo, or as part of ordinary-course asset divestitures. There are many considerations to address when conducting a patent sale to ensure that both the buyer and seller realize maximum value from the transaction; however, one issue in particular that is sometimes overlooked is the importance of assessing

All in the Family – Sales of “Patent Families” Read More »

Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v MasterCard Incorporated and others

Sainsbury

Reed Smith – This case is very important in that it is one of the first judgments where damages have been awarded for breach of competition rules in UK. It relates to MasterCard’s alleged anticompetitive card fees (credit and debit cards). The award was for £68,582,245 plus interest which is a significant sum, but there

Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Ltd v MasterCard Incorporated and others Read More »

Proxy Season Highlights

Boardroom

Skadden Arps –  Encouraged by the success of proxy access proposals in the 2015 proxy season, shareholder proponents have submitted almost 200 proxy access shareholder proposals for 2016 annual meetings. As of mid-June, approximately 65 percent of companies receiving a proxy access shareholder proposal have adopted or proposed a 3 percent proxy access bylaw or

Proxy Season Highlights Read More »

Standby: Here Come The Drones

Drones

Pilsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman – The wait is over for businesses across the United States eager to fly small drones (also known as small unmanned aircraft systems or sUAS).  The new Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) rule regarding commercial operation of sUAS, known as Part 107, is now in effect.  Part 107 opens the door to

Standby: Here Come The Drones Read More »

Scroll to Top