Its a case of a nasty divorce that just got nastier disaffected litigant Allison Huynh alleged that Big Law firm Morrison & Foerster had been a “willing architect and facilitator” in a nefarious scheme to cheat her and her children out of former husband and Google code writer Scott Hassan’s share of a fortune.
Hassan (right) helped write Google’s original code and is widely regarded as Google’s ‘third founder’.
A tech and robotics entrepreneur, he is sued in the messy divorce with Huynh claiming Morrison & Foerster represented her husband in a manner thast created financial harm to herself as a former client of the firm.
Huynh is herself a tech entrepreneur and began the divorce proceedings in 2015 following a 15 year marriage to Hassan
The lawsuit describes the firm’s alleged “disloyalty to and betrayal of” Huynh, who’s represented by Walter Lack and Steven Shuman of Los Angeles-based litigation firm Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack.
“We deny all the allegations made by the plaintiff against the firm and its representatives and we will address them in the proper forum,” a Morrison & Foerster spokesperson said.
Morrison & Foerster was “the willing architect and facilitator” of Hassan’s “nefarious scheme to cheat his wife and children out of hundreds of millions of dollars,” the suit alleges.
Before the divorce filing, Morrison & Foerster had represented Huynh in the formation of her own tech company while also representing tech and real-estate family companies launched by Hassan, the suit says. The suit describes Hassan as the widely acknowledged “third founder of Google.”
When Huynh filed for divorce, Morrison & Foerster “improperly chose sides, aligning themselves with Hassan,” her lawsuit said.
The firm “associated in” as Hassan’s counsel, represented at least six Hassan-affiliated deponents, and “continued to represent the family companies that Hassan managed in a way that was detrimental.”
The family court judge in the divorce disqualified Morrison & Foerster from representing Hassan in that action, but the law firm “decided to flout rather than follow” the order by continuing to assist Hassan in the divorce and by representing companies he managed, the suit alleges.
A $90 million tax benefit to Hassan is one of the issues pleaded by Huynh as the result of an alleged ‘fire sale’ of one of his companies for “a paltry $400,000, thus creating the tax benefit. As half owner of the company, Huynh said she had to file a suit to stop the sale, incurring over $1 million in legal costs.
Forbes and Bloomberg Law had coverage of the prior lawsuit.
Along with the firm itself, Morrison & Foerster partner Paul “Chip” Lion III is also named as a defendant.
Morrison & Foerster deny all the allegations made against them.
Read More From One of the Net’s First Law News Sites
- Quinn Emanuel Partner Awarded Ukraine’s Order of Merit for Landmark Human Rights Case Against Russia
Four years into Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the battlefield has long since expanded beyond territory.… Read more: Quinn Emanuel Partner Awarded Ukraine’s Order of Merit for Landmark Human Rights Case Against Russia - How To Negotiate A Shareholders Agreement That Prevents Future DisputesPower Briefing: Substance Law In the initial excitement of launching a new business, founders are… Read more: How To Negotiate A Shareholders Agreement That Prevents Future Disputes
- Big Law’s Burning Question in 2026: How Many Billables for Your REM Cycle?
A recent contributor noted the pleasures of holidays with sleep, an issue that biglaw deals… Read more: Big Law’s Burning Question in 2026: How Many Billables for Your REM Cycle? - M&A Team at White & Case Expands With Airi Hammalov Joining FirmGlobal law firm White & Case LLP has expanded its Global Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A)… Read more: M&A Team at White & Case Expands With Airi Hammalov Joining Firm
- Why Timing Strategy Is Just as Important as Evidence in Car Accident CasesArticle source: Rosenfeld Injury Lawyers, IL Every car accident case begins with the same instinct:… Read more: Why Timing Strategy Is Just as Important as Evidence in Car Accident Cases
- Norton Rose Partners Just Pocketed a 27% Payday – Blame the US (and a Bit of AI Magic)
While the rest of Big Law was still muttering about market uncertainty, Norton Rose Fulbright quietly had one of those years that makes equity partners smile into their morning flat white. The firm racked up more than US$2.8 billion in global gross revenue for 2025 – a tidy 16% jump. But the real headline? Profits per equity partner shot up 27% to nearly US$2.1 million. You read that right. Nearly $2.1 million. Per partner. Per year. - How Injury Law Intersects with Medical and Financial RealitiesArticle source: Trust Guss Injury Lawyers, Houston Source When someone gets injured, life does not… Read more: How Injury Law Intersects with Medical and Financial Realities
