
LegalBusiness editor Alex Novarese has been reporting on the law profession for a long time – but there has been nothing like the current Coronavirus crisis to confront the profession. His opinion piece is worth considering to help provide some context to the crisis, using the GFC as an ‘anchor’.
The longer you do this job, the more your mind wanders to the big moments – recessions, terrorist attacks, political shocks, wars. Yet as I sit here typing this leader in a near-deserted London office, the majority of our team working from home as we try to put this issue to bed, it is a struggle to recall anything that compares to the coronavirus pandemic spreading through the world.
We face unprecedented times – hyperbole typically flung around with abandon until you realise with shock that this time it applies. As I write, London and New York, those famous global cities and the world’s two dominant legal hubs, look within days of total lockdown.
But since people cannot get by mentally without context and narrative, I’ll use the banking crisis more than a decade ago as the anchor, the closest touchpoint to what the profession now faces. The rolling sense of fear and uncertainty is certainly familiar.
… perhaps managing partners have yet to catch up with the speed of this crisis, and the looming threat to cash flow.
Alex Novarese
At the time of Lehman’s collapse, the profession went in fat, complacent and inefficient and came out shell-shocked and lean. Debt was cut, balance sheets cleaned up, operational management improved. Few law firms failed. That period cut a swathe through the profession and led to job losses on a scale never before seen.
Client Expectations
Client expectations changed – whether they changed enough is open to debate – and law firms partially listened. In retrospect, there was more nervousness among law firm leaders back then than now – with their biggest clients being the first hit in the post-Lehman age.
In many regards, the law currently looks like one of the least directly-impacted industries. But perhaps managing partners have yet to catch up with the speed of this crisis, and the looming threat to cash flow.
The relevant point here, obviously, is how the huge promises of state aid for business will work and whether it can keep money flowing to bill-paying clients.
Like the banking crisis, this is an inflection point that will change the world, change business and the profession with it. There will be a sharp economic shock and what emerges at the other end will mean many received wisdoms on issues like globalisation, open borders, state intervention and the role of business are up for revision. We entered the coronavirus crisis as a society dominated by division and identity politics – will we emerge with these concerns seeming as anything more than the trivialities of post-capitalism complacency?
‘Unprecedented Experiment’
At the prosaic industry level, law firms are now already well into an unprecedented experiment with remote working. It is probable that major changes to the dominant business models of the law will emerge.
Returning finally to the lessons of the banking crisis, this will be another period in which institutional illusions will be brutally stripped away, elevating some firms and individuals and diminishing others. Recent years have seen law firms often badge themselves on soft issues and lofty values. This crisis will put those sentiments to the test.
I have covered the legal industry long enough to know that some will fall far short of their rhetoric. But I also believe many will distinguish themselves in how they treat staff, colleagues and clients (and it should be in that order). I
n 20 years of observing the industry, I still find more angels than devils. The days ahead will determine whether that is wishful thinking or not. Either way, we’ll strive to keep you informed. Take care.
Source: LegalBusiness

Author – Alex Novarese is editor-in-chief and in-house legal counsel at LegalBusiness. His LinkedIn profile is here.
Recently on LawFuel
- UK Law News – Private Equity’s Legal Buying Spree Continues With Second Acquisition
- Judge Blasts Maurice Blackburn Over Delayed $120M Qantas Payout
- US Department of Justice – Former Executive Director and Former Employee of Queens Defenders Legal Services Non-Profit Sentenced to Prison for Embezzling Funds
- Shock Move Sees Wachtell Litigation Stars Walk to Rival
- Trump DOJ Subpoenas 14 Big Law Firms in ABA ‘Intimidation’ Fight
- What Makes The Social Media Victims Law Center Different From Other Law Firms?
- The Great BigLaw Heist. How Private Equity Is Buying Law Firms Through the Back Door
- The Kirklands vs. Latham AI Arms Race Sees Associates on the Front Line
- The Business Case for Single-Practice Personal Injury Firms
- $74M Legal Negligence Claim Against Orrick Collapses on Limitation GroundsThe English High Court has handed Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe a decisive win, granting summary judgment and striking out a $74 million negligence claim against its London office on limitation grounds. In a ruling that turned heavily on timing, Mr Justice Cotter found that the claimants, a Nigerian company and its two owners, had failed to bring their case within the required statutory period, describing their delay in pursuing the claim as “truly extraordinary.” Log in to read . .
- Merger Mayhem As New Firm Feels The Heat With Aircon Collapse
- Lathrop GPM Combines with HG Law Expanding Global IP Capabilities, Adding Offices in New York and London and Continued Growth in Silicon Valley
- Norm Ai’s $1.2B Legal AI Gambit AsThe First True AI‑Native Law Firm Comes For Big Law’s Billable Hour