
The Kiwifruit Growers are aggrieved at losing their Court of Appeal case in a decision released today and following an appeal a year ago seeking damages for Government negligence in permitting the PSA disease into the country.
The Court of Appeal decision today allowe the Crown’s appeal on the basis that the Crown had a statutory immunity that precluded liablity for the alleged negligent acts or omissions (the full Court of Appeal press release is here).
The Court said it would have found no duty of care to exist in the particular circumstances. While there was sufficient proximity for a duty of care to exist, policy factors, in particular indeterminacy, meant it would not be fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care in the circumstances.
The PSA outbreak in 2009 devasted the kiwifruit industry and the Kiwifruit Claim, financed by legal funder LPG Group, has said they will now appeal to the Supreme Court.
Kiwifruit Claim Chairman John Cameron said that growers are aggrieved by today’s Court of Appeal decision that finds the Government was responsible for the 2009 PSA outbreak but is not liable for the losses. He confirmed they will appeal the decision in the Supreme Court.
“The Court of Appeal held that MPI was negligent in allowing a high-risk shipment of pollen anthers infected with PSA from China into New Zealand. But they found the Government does not owe a duty of care to ordinary New Zealanders and can’t be held liable for its actions, simply because it’s the Government,” said John Cameron, Kiwifruit Claim Chairman.
“The decision by the Court of Appeal relied upon an interpretation of the Crown Proceedings Act that effectively means the Government can’t be held to account for any wrongdoing.
“We believe this interpretation is wrong. It is both logical and reasonable that the Government should be held responsible for its actions, and those of its employees, where it is clear that significant harm and losses have resulted from their negligence. This is no different to the law that allows us to hold local councils and private business to account for their negligence,” said Mr Cameron.
“While our legal team need to analyse this latest decision, this is far from over. We will appeal this decision to the Supreme Court,” said Mr Cameron. “We would like to acknowledge the hard work from our legal team and the financial support provided by litigation funders, LPF Group, who have enabled this case to proceed this far.”
>> Kiwifruit claim costs million

>> Litigation Funding Power Lawyer
Recently on LawFuel
- Why Lorenz & Lorenz Are Austin’s Most Trusted Injury Law FirmArticle: Lorenz & Lorenz, PLLC Nestled amidst the vibrant Texas Hill Country, Austin is… Read more: Why Lorenz & Lorenz Are Austin’s Most Trusted Injury Law Firm
- How to Request an Excuse from Jury Duty in FloridaArticle: Baggett Law Injury Lawyers, Florida Getting a jury duty summons for the legal… Read more: How to Request an Excuse from Jury Duty in Florida
- US Law Merger – Carmody Announces Combination with New London Firm Waller Smith & Palmer P.C.A traumatic brain injury (TBI) represents one of the most catastrophic and life-altering consequences… Read more: US Law Merger – Carmody Announces Combination with New London Firm Waller Smith & Palmer P.C.
- US Attorney Announces Animal Abuse Task Force of Federal and Local Law AgenciesLOS ANGELES – Acting United States Attorney Bill Essayli today announced the creation of a… Read more: US Attorney Announces Animal Abuse Task Force of Federal and Local Law Agencies
- The Lawyer Who Worked 23 Hours a Day And the Billing Scam Everyone Knows AboutThe Law Firm Billing Myth Ben Thomson, LawFuel contributing editor The legal profession has… Read more: The Lawyer Who Worked 23 Hours a Day And the Billing Scam Everyone Knows About