
We reported on the incident involving Nelson lawyer Anjela Sharma earlier this year when Justice Davison rejected her plea for Air New Zealand to lift her travel ban after bad behaviour in the Koru Lounge.
Now her’s order her to pay the airline $30,114 for costs and $3,657.21 in disbursements after her failed bid to have them permit her to travel.
Although apparently also an arbitrator and/or mediator, Anjela Sharma’s AMINZ profile is remarkably sparse. Mediation skills did not come immediately to mind with the Koru incident.
>> Brand New!The new tool to make your work easier . . and more profitable. Check here
The one-year ban was imposed following behaviour that was regarded as “bullying” and as “pushing the boundaries of decency” when she travels.
The Air New Zealand report said: “I feel Mrs Sharma uses bullying tactics to gain her own way every time she travels, we are always courteous and helpful to her, but she pushes the boundaries of decency every time she travels, and I would like to put a stop to her countless demands with us,” the report said.
The Air New Zealand staff member said in the report that Sharma and her family were not welcome in the Nelson Koru Lounge in the future and sought action to prevent this type of action happening again.
Sharma claimed Air New Zealand wrote to her and alleged she and her family had been refused entry, entered the lounge without permission, and the family was loud and aggressive.
In his judgment earlier this year, Justice Davison said –
The report described the applicant and members of her family as being very loud, disruptive, and intimidating during their dealings with the Lounge hostess over their entitlement to use the Lounge. The report said that members of the applicant’s family called the Lounge hostess stupid and racist, and mocked and loudly mimicked her voice when she greeted other passengers entering the Lounge. The report further noted that at one point a member of the airport security staff was called to the Lounge and had offered to call the Police.
Sharma filed the proceeding to the High Court following Justice Davison’s decision, stating the airline was in breach of its contractual obligations to her as a passenger who had booked and paid for several flights she had not yet taken.
More on LawFuel NZ
- Auckland’s New Crown Solicitor AppointedIn a move that further advances women in the legal profession the Solicitor General …
- Law Society Introduces “Strategic Priorities”The New Zealand Law Society has announced its moves to adapt to the rapidly …
- Who Are The ‘Tier 1’ Top NZ Law Firms In The Legal500 For 2023?The Legal 500 rankings for 2023 include a range of kiwi law firms that …
Who Are The ‘Tier 1’ Top NZ Law Firms In The Legal500 For 2023? Read More »
- Which Are The 30 Most Prestigious Law Firms . . Anywhere?Here are the 30 most prestigious law firms in the world – America’s best law firms to work for
- Lawyer of the Year 2022 Tudor Clee – From Car Boot to ‘Loophole Lawyer’, the Lawyer Who Fought The Government And WonLawFuel’s 2022 Lawyer of the Year is the battling ‘loophole lawyer’ who fought to get Charlotte Bellis into the country under the MIQ lottery system.
- Gender Inequality in the Law Continues As Australian Survey IllustratesAfter years attempting to advance the number of female partners in Australian law firms, …
Gender Inequality in the Law Continues As Australian Survey Illustrates Read More »
- The 3 Key Selling Points Law Firms Need To Consider To Attract Quality Law Candidates (It’s not all about money)Leading legal recruiter Louise Hall-Strutt see ‘horror stories’ that turn off potential candidates for …