LAWFUEL – See ‘Hot Files’ – Q & A: Why pay $200 for a Q-Ray Ionized Bracelet when you can get relief from an aspirin tablet that costs 1¢? So stated Seventh Circuit Judge Frank Easterbrook when he handed the makers of the ‘Q Ray Ionized Bracelet’ their heads (in the form of an order to disgorge $16 million in profits from the bracelet he variously described as “poppycock”, “technobabble”, and “blather”.
Read More
Causation Disputes in Personal Injury Cases
April 3, 2026
Bird & Bird Re-Elects CEO
April 2, 2026
Squire Patton Announce New European Managing Partner
April 1, 2026
Law Australia – New Era for Mallesons
March 30, 2026