What does the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn Andersen’s conviction mean? And will it change the outlook for other executives in trouble with the law?
“Today’s verdict is wrong…The reality here is that this verdict represents only a technical conviction.” So reads a statement Arthur Andersen issued back on June 15, 2002, just after a Houston jury found the accounting firm guilty concerning its actions in the Enron affair. Technical though it may have been—Andersen was convicted not for abetting […]