
They may be relics these days, but for barrister Ray Broomhall, the collection of wigs is part of a desire to retain a slice of legal history. But at the same time this barrister has successfully fought against something far more modern than the wigs of old.
As wigs are now part of legal history in most of both Australian and New Zealand courts, the Tasmanian barrister recognises that they also represent the legal characters who wore them.
Mr Broomhall said he would like to get his hands on former justice of the High Court Michael Kirby’s wig.
“I’d love to have one of his wigs — whether his barrister wig or one that he wore in the High Court. That would be to me the ultimate,” he said.
He would not put a price on how much he has spent on his unusual collection.
“It’s not the wig itself — it’s the people behind the wig,” he said.
“The story behind each wig is absolutely amazing, and they’re priceless when you think of the stories behind them.”
Taking pride of place in his collection is the wig worn by Thomas Strangman when he successfully prosecuted Indian civil rights leader Mahatma Gandhi for sedition in 1922.
“There was actually a big court case that said you can’t trade in human body parts, so barristers were walking around with human-hair wigs and they found they had to go to horsehair,” Mr Broomhall said.
While the more modern wigs follow a pattern which includes a set guide of the number of side curls for barristers and back curls for judges, each wig is subtly different.
The wigs’ individual quirks give a special insight into the wearer.
Full-bottomed wigs for judges have been phased out — even for ceremonial occasions — in Tasmania.
The now-retired wigs are still housed at the Supreme Court of Tasmania in Hobart. Registrar Jim Connolly is the keeper of Supreme Court of Tasmania judges’ wigs.
“They’re part of our legal history,” Mr Connolly said.
“These wigs are handmade. They are made of horsehair and they are fitted to the particular judge’s head that they need to adorn.
The Barrister’s Fight Against 5G
Barrister Broomhall is not just about collecting and retaining a slice of legal history however. He has also spearheaded a successful legal fight against the introduction of the 5G network in Australia with his ‘Say No’ campaign.
The basis for the Broomhall opposition to 5G is the dangers alleged to emanate from magnetic fields and he has spoken widely across Australia about the dangers and the opposition to the implementation of the 5G network.
Source: ABC
Other Law News
- Australia Law – NSW Chief Justice’s Honour – A Rule of Law ChampionThe awarding of Australia’s highest civil honour to NSW Chief Justice Andrew Bell recognises a life and career focused on… Read more: Australia Law – NSW Chief Justice’s Honour – A Rule of Law Champion
- What is the largest personal injury law firm in America?Ben Thomson, LawFuel contributing writer Morgan & Morgan is the law firm that is widely seen as the largest personal… Read more: What is the largest personal injury law firm in America?
- NZ Legal Profession Hits 17,500 Lawyers as Women Dominate New IntakeNew Zealand’s legal profession is still growing, still skewing young and female, and still overwhelmingly European in makeup, according to… Read more: NZ Legal Profession Hits 17,500 Lawyers as Women Dominate New Intake
- The Legal ‘Cease and Desist’ Fallout in the Beckham Family FeudBrooklyn Beckham has reportedly escalated what was once whisper-quiet family tension into a full-blown legal standoff with parents David and… Read more: The Legal ‘Cease and Desist’ Fallout in the Beckham Family Feud
- Sullivan & Cromwell Adds Two Finance Partners in LondonLONDON (January 20, 2026)—Sullivan & Cromwell LLP announced today that Christopher McLaughlin and Alastair McVeigh will join the firm as… Read more: Sullivan & Cromwell Adds Two Finance Partners in London
- Jo Sidhu KC Disbarment Upheld by High CourtHigh Court Upholds Disbarment of Jo Sidhu KC, Signalling Cultural Shift at the Bar Sonia Hickey The High Court’s refusal… Read more: Jo Sidhu KC Disbarment Upheld by High Court
- The Talent Wars Hunger Games ContinueFTI’s Ex-Star Economist, Goldman and the Talent War That Became a Lawsuit FTI Consulting just reminded everyone that professional services… Read more: The Talent Wars Hunger Games Continue
- US Law Firm – GrayRobinson Adds Former US Attorney Julie PosteraroORLANDO, Fla. – GrayRobinson is pleased to announce Julie Posteraro has joined the firm as a shareholder in its Litigation Section. A former Assistant U.S.… Read more: US Law Firm – GrayRobinson Adds Former US Attorney Julie Posteraro
- “Divorce Day” Is a Myth. But Lawyers Keep Selling It AnywayEvery January, family lawyers dust off the same press release: Divorce Day is coming. Phones will ring. Marriages will collapse.… Read more: “Divorce Day” Is a Myth. But Lawyers Keep Selling It Anyway
- The Legal and Financial Implications of Consolidating Your Student Loans
- NZ Law – Russell McVeagh recognised in Legal 500 Asia Pacific Guide 2026
- UK Law News – Claire Gordon appointed Head of Family at Farrer & Co
- The Legal Risks and Protections in Modern Income‑Focused Investments
- Brabners’ Eight-Year Growth Streak Powers London Expansion: What Regional Firms Can Learn
This article is inaccurate. There is no legal precedent against emitters of EME in Australia. The first case tested the Maroochydore magistrates court Jan-20
was dismissed by the judge who referred to the “method” as “incompetent”.
This method did also not stop the TPG roll-out in Australia. It was halted due to the Huawei ban and the ACCC initially blocking the merger between TPG and VHA. Now that the merger can proceed, the rollout of small cells will resume.
I did a workshop with Ray having heard about his loss in the courts in Queensland. I am disappointed as I can’t see how any of the methodologys he suggested could be used. Am i right.? This question relates to 5G
That’s right – it’s giving those concerned false hope