Lawyer John Tamihere claimed his background as a lawyer helped in his obtaining of a settlement over defamatory claims made by NZME-owned Newstalk ZB host Mike Hosking.
[adrotate banner=”95″]
NZ Herald Pic. Photo: RNZ / Anneke Smith
Tamihere received his Court-ordered apology in the High Court, read by lawyer Alan Ringwood, Bell Gully media lawyer and litigator. Ringwood said it accepted Te Pou Matakana was entitled to receive the funds and pay out the sums that it did to its shareholders. The radio station then apologised over comments Hosking made implying the Māori Party co-leader had personally benefited from Whānau Ora funding to the tune of $600,000 which was not the case.
Hosking apologised on the air today.
The decision of Justice Lang last September.
“You can’t hold your head up so you have to defend yourself. I’m lucky enough to be a trained lawyer with enough resources to defend myself; a lot of Māori don’t,” Tamihere said.
“What I can say is that contribution of some significance will be made to the Māori Party election campaign and you can thank Mike Hosking for that.”
Today’s apology is about comments Hosking made about payments that had been made by the North Island Whānau Ora commissioning agency Te Pou Matakana in December 2018.
Te Pou Matakana had received funds from the Ministry of Māori Development, Te Puni Kōkiri, and had paid that money out to its shareholders.
“The way in which the item was worded could have been taken to mean that John Tamihere personally benefitted from the payments.
“Newstalk ZB accepts that Tamihere did not benefit personally from the payments and sincerely apologises to John Tamihere,” Ringwood said.
Outside court Tamihere said he hoped Hosking and his bosses had learnt racially stereotyping others was wrong.
“I think it sends a message to mainstream broadcasters, particularly very powerful brands, that racial stereotyping is not right because it casts suspicion on all Māori around financial transactions and it’s just not right.”
He said he had offered to resolve the dispute “the Kiwi way” with an apology over a beer but had to take it to court to clear his name.
“You’ve got to hold your mana in your communities. You can’t walk around you communities up and down the country with them believing that you’ve got your fingers in their till. That was the allegation.
Read More LawFuel NZ News Here
- Simpson Thacher Recruit Top Financial Services Lawyer from Freshfields
- Freshfields Cut Its European Partners. Its New York Partners Got A Raise.
Freshfields’ US growth ambitions has forced out equity partners across London, Paris and Germany, the Financial Times reported on 13 July, weeks after a pay overhaul left dozens of its roughly 500 partners holding fewer equity points. Freshfields reset its internal exchange rate from $1.60 to the pound down to about $1.30, then handed extra points to its top US earners so their dollar pay held. Points are a share of a fixed pool and Freshfields’ European partners are the pool. The Financial Times reported this week that Freshfields has culled equity partners in recent weeks, with its London headquarters and its Paris and German offices all seeing exits and equity downgrades. City AM ran it as a shake-up to fund the American push, which it is. What neither write-up reached is the ledger entry that explains it, and that ledger entry has been sitting in public since March. Log in to read . . . - Australia Law – Corrs Advise on Creation of A12.6 Billion Gold Producer
- How AI Really Sees Law Firms — And Why Most Look Exactly the Same
For three decades, law firm marketing has been built around being “known”: directories, awards, rankings, pitch documents and carefully honed websites. That world hasn’t disappeared but the way clients first meet your firm has. And a new UK report on law marketing in the age of AI has thrown an interesting light on what your firm needs to do to be recognized by AI. First impressions of law firms is increasingly formed not by your homepage, but by an AI system summarising everything it can find about you into a single paragraph, before the prospective client has clicked a thing. In that world, the question stops being “Does my page rank?” and becomes “When an AI assembles a view of my firm, is that view distinctive, credible and worth recommending?”. Log in to read . . . - NZ Legal News – Former Open Country Dairy executive pleads guilty in SFO case over $250,000 in kickbacks
