Dramatically Changed Landscape Confronts Legal Profession
From skills shortages and high demand for professionals of all kinds, the sudden prospect of a deep recession or even depression has fundamentally shifted the landscape practically overnight. For legal professionals, the exact extent of the fallout is as yet unclear for NZ law jobs, but candidates should be aware that demand for their skills is already falling.
That’s according to Kirsty Spears, (right) director at legal recruitment firm McLeod Duminy. “After years of skills shortages and high demand across all disciplines and most levels of lawyers, the dynamic has changed. It is generous to describe present circumstances as a flat market, with widespread anticipation of a coming recession,” she says.
Like other workers, legal professionals either looking to start their careers as recent graduates or those looking to change jobs, are faced with new challenges. “It is yet to be seen whether we will face significant redundancies, but enquiries from New Zealand lawyers based overseas suggest a number will come home and further drive up competition for jobs, while fewer opportunities are available,” says Spears.
She points out that the effects will be uneven, as in some areas – such as employment, insolvency & restructuring, family, and other civil disputes – the impacts of a recession could well result in increased demand for legal services.
“It would be easy to say lawyers should turn their focus to these areas of law, but experience tells us that changing focus can be difficult, and firms have resisted previous calls to multi-skill their lawyers to make them more recession-proof and have instead pushed further towards specialisation. In any case, anticipating where demand will be in such a unique circumstance is far from a perfect science.”
That unpredictability is borne out by recent news of major law firms repaying wage subsidies after anticipated revenue declines hadn’t materialised.
. . a mindset change is required, and you should keep an eye on the future with a clear career plan. It could be more difficult to recover from a misstep now . .
Kirsty Spears
“Of course, the real impacts of the lockdown will only be fully felt over the coming months and even years as current projects come to a close, and we get a better understanding of the stimulus measures the government intends to put in place,” Spears adds.
Not All Doom & Gloom For NZ Law Jobs
It’s not all doom and gloom, though.
Recalling the 2008 Global Financial Crisis and the international reverberations of the 2001 September 11 terrorist attacks, Spears notes those market changes were even more sudden than the impact of Covid-19. “We recruited through those events and, while looking for a new job was a different proposition, and much harder, it isn’t impossible.
Most importantly, a mindset change is required, and you should keep an eye on the future with a clear career plan. It could be more difficult to recover from a misstep now.”
Spears advises candidates to be open-minded, fully explore any opportunity which presents itself, and be prepared for compromise. “Understand that opportunities are likely to be few and far between; perhaps it isn’t the ideal position, but if you choose not to pursue it there should be a good reason not to apply, it should be a proactive decision.”
. . Focus instead on potential, work/life balance and other things that have value for you outside remuneration
Kirsty Spears
She says time and care should be taken. “Engage fully with the recruitment process so you’re in an informed position when considering a potential opportunity. You never know what you might find out through the process which could go beyond initial expectations, such as discovering an inspirational partner or working with new clients from whom you could learn. It is important to keep an eye on your ultimate goals and make sure any role you accept still takes you in that direction. You may have to look at stepping stones for your career, rather than the leap forward you may have previously sought.”
Another area where expectations will need adjustment is salary and remuneration.
The common wisdom that a change of role brings a salary increase has remained true for many years, but is unlikely to continue. “Focus instead on potential, work/life balance and other things that have value for you outside remuneration. These factors are bargaining chips to come to mutually satisfactory arrangements with employers.”
Finally, Spears says it is important to stay connected to work and the profession.
“If possible, avoid a big gap on your CV. If you have to take a compromise job, make sure you know where it is taking you and see it as the first step in working your way forward. Get good people and trusted advisers to assist in your search. Keep an open mind and be open to their advice”.
[adrotate banner=”93″]
More on LawFuel . .
- Why Employers Who Fail to Verify Work Authorization Are Facing Increased Legal Scrutiny in 2026
- Top 5 Custom AI Development Companies for Growth in 2026
- Slaughter And May Still Rules London’s Listed Market. The Problem Is The Market Is Shrinking
- Sports Law Professor: NBA’s Clippers Penalties Send Clear Message — Teams Can’t Buy Their Way Around Salary Cap
- NZ Law – Anthony Harper Joined by Litigator Cecil Hanafin
- Meredith Connell Clean Up On Fees in Tauranga Landslide Legal Defence
Ratepayers across Tauranga are picking up a legal and professional advice bill exceeding $1.2 million in the aftermath of the fatal Mauao (Mount Maunganui) landslide, highlighting the mounting exposure and legal complexities facing local authorities in disaster response. Figures presented to the Tauranga City Council (TCC) reveal that responding to the tragic 22 January 2026 slip, which claimed six lives at the Mount Maunganui Beachside Holiday Park, has so far cost more than $5 million from the council’s $7 million emergency risk reserves. Of that, professional advice and legal review expenses have rapidly spiralled past $1.7 million, with external counsel and legal support alone accounting for well over $1.2 million. - Big Law Firms Have Been Keeping the AI Savings – Now Wall Street Wants Them Back
Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Citi are asking a rather uncomfortable question of their outside lawyers: if AI is making legal work faster, why aren’t the bills getting smaller? Power Points Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup are pushing major law firms to demonstrate how AI efficiencies are being reflected in their legal bills. Citi has begun asking firms bidding for work to explain their AI-related savings, while Morgan Stanley is moving much of its outside legal work toward competitive bidding and alternative fee arrangements. The pressure goes directly to the BigLaw leverage model, where armies of associates traditionally generated large volumes of billable hours. New LexisNexis research shows 94 per cent of lawyers now use AI for legal work and 55 per cent expect AI to change law firm billing. The battle is shifting from whether lawyers should use AI to a much more interesting question: who gets the financial benefit? For the past few years BigLaw has been enthusiastically telling anyone within PowerPoint range that artificial intelligence will transform legal practice and clients have been listening.
