Law Firm Ownership Changes for DC . . And The Big Four Accountants Will Be Watching Carefully

Washington D.C. is the latest jurisdiction to look at whether the rules surrounding law firm ownership should be changed.

Bloombergs report that DC’s bar is to look at alternatives to the present law firm ownership rules, saying it will look at the evolving legal service delivery models, which includes non-lawyer ownership of law firms.

Bar members will have the opportunity to express their views on proposed changes, which would involve fee-sharing and other “alternative business structures” might prove beneficial to firms and their clients.

Such changes have been supported by access to justice advocates across the country who seek more affordable options for Americans seeking legal help. But opponents of rule changes have expressed concerns, including about threats posed to attorney independence and legal ethics, Bloomberg Big Law Business report.

Changes to law firm ownership have already been examined in Arizona, California, and Utah, as well as Chicago, which for the last several months have been weighing similar changes.

Many proposed changes involve modifying Bar Rule 5.4 and its strict limits on law firm ownership.

Andrew Perlman, dean of Suffolk Law School in Boston, said in a written statement that the D.C. Bar announcement is “an encouraging development.”

“Decades ago, D.C. became a leader in this area, and D.C. has the opportunity once again to play a leadership role,” he said.

Big Four Interest

The possibility of changes to the ownership of law firms will be particularly interesting for the Big Four accountancies.

Law firm leaders have noted that the Big Four and other alternative legal service providers, all of whom are already mounting significant competition to traditional law firm services, could take advantage of such a change by opening new legal operations that compete more directly with law firms.

D.C.’s version of Rule 5.4 is already slightly less restrictive than the American Bar Association’s Model Rule 5.4 that most states have adopted, which forbids partnerships between lawyers and nonlawyers if any of the activities of the partnership consist of the practice of law.

Recent Posts on LawFuel

• Which Law Firms Could Be Left Behind in the 2025 Pay + Legal AI Shake-Up?
  Big pay cheques, flashy AI demos, bold merger promises — these are all the usual theatrics in law firm press releases. But beneath the PR sheen, cracks are widening: not every firm can sustain both rising compensation and heavy AI spending without wobbling. Some are already looking shaky.
• Deputy PM David Lammy’s Return to the Law
  From Global Diplomacy to Leaking Courthouses David Lammy has swapped the trappings of global diplomacy… Read more: Deputy PM David Lammy’s Return to the Law
• The Giorgio Armani Business Rules That Lawyers Could Learn From
  What Lawyers Could Learn from Fashion’s Last Emperor Norma Harris, Contributing writer Giorgio Armani died… Read more: The Giorgio Armani Business Rules That Lawyers Could Learn From
• Google’s $425 Million Trial Loss And Cooley’s Surprise Starring Role
  The Lawyers Who Took Google’s Billing Bonanza Tom Borman, LawFuel contributing editor Google has been… Read more: Google’s $425 Million Trial Loss And Cooley’s Surprise Starring Role
• The Lawyer Who Worked 23 Hours a Day And the Billing Scam Everyone Knows About
  The Law Firm Billing Myth Ben Thomson, LawFuel contributing editor The legal profession has always… Read more: The Lawyer Who Worked 23 Hours a Day And the Billing Scam Everyone Knows About
• Japan’s Biggest Publishers Just Sued Perplexity AI for $44m
  Bezos-Backed Perplexity AI Accused of Free-Riding on Journalism Journalists aren’t thrilled about being turned into… Read more: Japan’s Biggest Publishers Just Sued Perplexity AI for $44m
• AI Is Smarter Than You—Until It Lies. Here’s How Your Firm Will Go Up in Flames If You Let It
  Generative AI is everywhere, but when lawyers used it, two ended up sanctioned for fake citations it’s time to cue the panic or – much better – privot to control and oversight of what your legal AI efforts are doing. Here we look at some of the key steps law firms should take to avoid the risks increasingly associated with generative AI tools.
• Lawyers Built This AI to Read Judges’ Minds — And BigLaw Is Already Hooked
  And Now Legal AI That Sees Into the Judge’s Mind . . Almost Tom Borman,… Read more: Lawyers Built This AI to Read Judges’ Minds — And BigLaw Is Already Hooked
• £65m Lifeline or Financial Casket? Pogust Goodhead’s Hedge-Driven Drama Unfolds
  A Hedge Fund Lifeline – With Strings Attached Ben Thomson, LawFuel contributing editor Pogust Goodhead,… Read more: £65m Lifeline or Financial Casket? Pogust Goodhead’s Hedge-Driven Drama Unfolds
• Harmeet Dhillon’s DOJ Shake-Up
  Dhillon DOJ: A Purge or a Reset? Ben Thomson, LawFuel contributing editor The appointment of… Read more: Harmeet Dhillon’s DOJ Shake-Up