The largest ever Justice Department settlement is pending with a $16 – $17 billion settlement pending over the Bank of America’s sale of mortgage-backed securities prior to the 2008 global financial crisis.
The deal is yet to be finalised but would be the biggest for the DoJ since the GFC, which lead to massive failures including the loss of homes by millions of Americans.
The last major settlement was the agreements reached between the DoJ and Citigroup and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
The person, who spoke on condition of anonymity because the deal had not yet been announced, cautioned that some details still needed to be worked out and that it was possible the agreement could fall apart.
But the person said the two sides reached an agreement in principle following a conversation last week between Attorney General Eric Holder and Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan.
The person said the tentative deal calls for the bank to pay roughly $9 billion in cash and for the remaining sum to go toward consumer relief.
A bank spokesman declined to comment.
The Wall Street Journal first reported details of the settlement discussions on Wednesday.
The deal would be the latest arising from the sale of toxic mortgage securities leading up to the recession. The Justice Department last year reached a $13 billion settlement with JPMorgan and in July announced a $7 billion settlement with Citigroup.
Each of these deals is designed to offer some financial relief to homeowners, whose mortgages were bundled into securities by the banks in question and then sold to investors. The securities contained residential mortgages from borrowers who were unlikely to be able to repay their loans, yet were publicly promoted as relatively safe investments until the housing market collapsed and investors suffered billions of dollars in losses.
The poor quality of the loans led to huge losses for investors and a slew of foreclosures, kicking off the recession that began in late 2007.
Yet the cash totals now being paid by some of America’s largest banks are not nearly enough to reverse the damages caused by the bursting of the housing bubble and the ensuing recession.
Millions of Americans lost their homes in foreclosures and found themselves jobless in the worst downturn since the 1930s. Even as the unemployment rate has clawed back to 6.2 percent from a peak of 10 percent, many people are no better off, as average household incomes after inflation are still lower than what they were seven years ago.
Consumer groups have criticized past settlements for being soft on the banks, noting that top executives at these firms have yet to face criminal charges for the actions of their companies, and for an apparent lack of transparency.
The previous settlements have been of a sweeping nature, releasing the banks from numerous claims by state and federal agencies in exchange for multibillion-dollar cash payments and promises of homeowner aid. “Statements of facts” accompanying the deals refrained from identifying executives involved in the alleged wrongdoing.
Dennis Kelleher, president and CEO of the advocacy group Better Markets, called on the Justice Department for a more detailed accounting of the settlement, urging officials to reveal information on investor losses, the names of any bank executives involved in alleged shady dealings and details on bank profit.