Washington D.C. is the latest jurisdiction to look at whether the rules surrounding law firm ownership should be changed.
Bloombergs report that DC’s bar is to look at alternatives to the present law firm ownership rules, saying it will look at the evolving legal service delivery models, which includes non-lawyer ownership of law firms.
Bar members will have the opportunity to express their views on proposed changes, which would involve fee-sharing and other “alternative business structures” might prove beneficial to firms and their clients.
Such changes have been supported by access to justice advocates across the country who seek more affordable options for Americans seeking legal help. But opponents of rule changes have expressed concerns, including about threats posed to attorney independence and legal ethics, Bloomberg Big Law Business report.
Changes to law firm ownership have already been examined in Arizona, California, and Utah, as well as Chicago, which for the last several months have been weighing similar changes.
Many proposed changes involve modifying Bar Rule 5.4 and its strict limits on law firm ownership.
Andrew Perlman, dean of Suffolk Law School in Boston, said in a written statement that the D.C. Bar announcement is “an encouraging development.”
“Decades ago, D.C. became a leader in this area, and D.C. has the opportunity once again to play a leadership role,” he said.
Big Four Interest
The possibility of changes to the ownership of law firms will be particularly interesting for the Big Four accountancies.
Law firm leaders have noted that the Big Four and other alternative legal service providers, all of whom are already mounting significant competition to traditional law firm services, could take advantage of such a change by opening new legal operations that compete more directly with law firms.
D.C.’s version of Rule 5.4 is already slightly less restrictive than the American Bar Association’s Model Rule 5.4 that most states have adopted, which forbids partnerships between lawyers and nonlawyers if any of the activities of the partnership consist of the practice of law.
Recent Posts on LawFuel
- Can the Magic Circle’s Most Profitable Firm Survive Its Own Success?Slaughter and May’s Billion-Dollar Dilemma – Expand or Perish John Bowie, LawFuel publisher Slaughter and… Read more: Can the Magic Circle’s Most Profitable Firm Survive Its Own Success?
- Trump’s $1bn BBC Defamation ShakedownFrom ABC to BBC – Trump’s Media Litigation Roadshow Claims New Victim Ben Thomson, LawFuel… Read more: Trump’s $1bn BBC Defamation Shakedown
- Saudi Market Lures BigLaw with Cash, Contracts and HeadachesRiyadh Rising For Big Law Ben Thomson, LawFuel contributor In the kind of year when… Read more: Saudi Market Lures BigLaw with Cash, Contracts and Headaches
- Luxury Expenses Claims Dog Pogust GoodheadPrivate jets, yachts and lavish spending are some of the claims against Thomas Goodhead, co-founder of Pogust Goodhead who is now at the center of one of the most significant governance crises in modern UK law firm litigation, according to a Times report. Pogust Goodhead (former SPG Law) secured a £450 million debt facility and is now seeing its co-founder CEO ousted before its headline case reaches judgment. Thomas Goodhead co-founded Pogust Goodhead with U.S. class action veteran Harris Pogust, propelling the firm into the big league in 2023 when it secured a reported £450 million investment . . . log in to read more
- Etiquette 101 for Kirkland & Ellis – How to Say PleaseKirkland & Ellis and the Fine Art of Saying Sorry Without Saying Sorry Norma Harris,… Read more: Etiquette 101 for Kirkland & Ellis – How to Say Please
- What’s Behind The BigLaw Litigation Hiring Surge?The masters of the M&A universe are discovering what the rest of us have known all along – that litigation pays, and it doesn’t evaporate when the dealmakers take a sabbatical. Fresh data from Bloomberg Law reveals that some of the legal industry’s most ludicrously profitable firms, the ones that built fortunes advising private equity titans, are now scrambling to stockpile litigators like they’re preparing for the apocalypse. Four heavyweights – Kirkland & Ellis, Paul Weiss, Davis Polk, and Paul Hastings – have inflated their litigation benches by at least 22 percnt since early 2024. It is noteworthy that these are firms that climbed to the top of the profitability charts primarily by perfecting the art of billing seven figures for corporate transactions, not courtroom combat.
- Targeting Rich UK Lawyers in New “Lawyer Tax”UK Chancellor Reeves Aims Her Sights on Lawyers & Others Ben Borman, LawFuel contributing editor… Read more: Targeting Rich UK Lawyers in New “Lawyer Tax”
- How Virginia Giuffre’s Litigation Strategy Changed the Legal Landscape for Sex Trafficking SurvivorsThe Virginia Giuffre Legal Legacy Sonia Hickey, LawFuel contributing editor Virginia Giuffre died in April… Read more: How Virginia Giuffre’s Litigation Strategy Changed the Legal Landscape for Sex Trafficking Survivors
- Steve Witkoff’s Career From Lawyer to Billionaire to Peace DealmakerThe Stunning Steve Witkoff Career Moves Ben Thomson, LawFuel contributing editor Before Steve Witkoff became… Read more: Steve Witkoff’s Career From Lawyer to Billionaire to Peace Dealmaker
- Why Is The World’s Richest Law Firm So Quiet About Its New Partners?The Silence of the Partners Tom Borman, LawFuel contributing editor Kirkland & Ellis, the world’s… Read more: Why Is The World’s Richest Law Firm So Quiet About Its New Partners?
