Jinyue (Paul) Young has been suspended by the New Zealand Lawyers and Conveyancers Disciplinary Tribunal for two-and-a-half years.
The two charges against Mr Young were for negligence or incompetence, and for “attempts to dissuade his former client pursuing the complaint”.
The Tribunal noted that the first charge arose because he took instructions from a Chinese client concerning family law litigation, for which he had no relevant experience.
The decision notes that Mr Young “kept no proper file, his advice was incompetent, his drafting of documents inadequate, his representation of his client in court was woeful.” Further, the Tribunal considered that Mr Young “lacks attributes necessary for him to be assessed as a fit and proper person to practice, even as an employee”.
Despite the Standards Committee’s argument that Mr Young should be struck off, the Tribunal imposed the lengthy term of suspension instead.
Firstly, it stated that on the basis of one file, it would be harsh to find that no lesser penalty would protect the public; secondly, it considered that it was obliged to restrict the penalty to the necessary minimum; and thirdly, it wished to preserve the harshest possible penalty to cases where the gravity of particulars of the charge, or the accumulation of disciplinary failings, demonstrated that the most severe penalty must be applied.
Mr Young was also ordered to pay costs of $43,647.
The maximum length of suspension available to the Tribunal is three years.
[adrotate banner=”105″]
- How to Build a Strong Trucking Case Before Key Evidence DisappearsArticle source: Jeff Marion Law, Buffalo, NY Photo by Igor Passchier via Pexels In New York alone, commercial trucks were involved… Read more: How to Build a Strong Trucking Case Before Key Evidence Disappears
- The UK Law Firm Vanishing Act: Over 1,100 Law Firms Gone in Five Years
Norma Harris, LawFuel contributing editor Well, if the UK legal scene were a magic show, the disappearing firms would be the… Read more: The UK Law Firm Vanishing Act: Over 1,100 Law Firms Gone in Five Years - Introducing Allens’ New Managing Partner
Marc Moken is the new Managing Partner at Allens. He currently heads Allens’ Funds, Superannuation and Financial Services Practice and is… Read more: Introducing Allens’ New Managing Partner - Law Firm Marketing in 2026: What Stopped Working and What Replaced It
Let’s be honest with each other for a moment. You didn’t go to law school to become a content creator. You went because you’re sharp, you like solving problems, and — let’s be real — the billing rates don’t exactly hurt. But here you are in 2026, staring down a marketing landscape that looks absolutely nothing like it did three years ago, while some LinkedIn bro in a blazer-and-jeans combo tells you to “post consistently or die.” You’re not dying because you’re bad at marketing. You’re struggling because the rulebook got shredded and nobody sent you the memo. Here’s what’s actually happening: clients are asking ChatGPT “what happens to the house if we divorce?” before they ever type your name into Google. Your lovingly crafted blog post — the one your firm spent four hours approving — is sitting underneath an AI summary that answers the question completely and sends precisely zero traffic your way. And the referral you were counting on last month? That client quietly asked an AI about you first. It didn’t go well. The numbers bear this out, and they’re not comfortable reading. AI Overviews are slashing organic click-through rates by somewhere between 58 and 61 percent the moment they appear on a results page (Seer Interactive, September 2025; Ahrefs, December 2025). - Legal AI Platform Expands with Houston and Chicago Offices
The explosive growth of legal AI operator Legora continues as they expand the company’s US operation with new offices in Houston… Read more: Legal AI Platform Expands with Houston and Chicago Offices
